Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FB4F1821D for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87042 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 22:46:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 87006 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 22:46:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@oodt.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@oodt.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 86994 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2015 22:46:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:46:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5E1C71A0C7F for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:46:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LznFVlXb5tRl for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8C0E8429AA for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id to18so70349254igc.0 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:46:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Dc37g8in3y3pMEwfVbUzTAfo7LX1sJDjYE+f04D9gAQ=; b=zire2wHYm+v2qYVq5PN2tltfKv5tjA4sxyVSjhGSi6gpGcIrFwZugsj6VM5WpXUEts BQT72RzB2JMOqmkm29n9oISgYLpXrDY0B4REL1SrMeh6dbOBNnXpZg+NKt7tsIT8hJSU lmalbc2YVg9UxwIqFmJ2+FkIcSS4t3JVE7tPidsShV5iHKMFrxIUS9KHgvMpQeUx8nTX eeO5ELMCMiNnVlmT8bR4l9FpQgD/XSxyEsvC70LT/cDvzg+Lq+NoHaFPvRwMSS7LrFT1 ECR9TKcCqbJq4v4b1yjnqKFnzjcY6Kd+9VMieO+q3yPcOt8vGOhPHuH2UlTMUvfUlTwZ mkNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.154.5 with SMTP id vk5mr261194igb.85.1450306009174; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:46:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.93.69 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:46:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:46:49 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release OODT 0.11 From: Lewis John Mcgibbney To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd76b987e1bc505270bae5d --047d7bd76b987e1bc505270bae5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 BOOM https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel Hector On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Tom Barber wrote: > OODT-781 > > Thanks > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok do you have a JIRA ticket Tom? I'll set it as blocker and shift > > everything else to 0.12 version. > > > > On Wednesday, December 16, 2015, Tom Barber > > wrote: > > > > > Yes, but the delete issue needs fixing first, not being able to delete > > > products is pretty high on the bad stakes. I've been dealing with sick > > kids > > > all week but if no one else fixes it by the end of the week I'll take a > > > look when I get 30 minutes. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > > > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > We've addressed 87 issues since 0.10. > > > > I think a 0.11 release would be good. I would like to revisit the > Avro > > > RPC > > > > work again after that with the aim of merging in to or even into a > > > 1.0. > > > > What does everyone think? > > > > Lewis > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Lewis* > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Lewis* > > > -- *Lewis* --047d7bd76b987e1bc505270bae5d--