Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F38921820C for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65452 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 09:58:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 65417 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 09:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@oodt.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@oodt.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 65405 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2015 09:58:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:58:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F2216C0715 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:58:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.98 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=meteorite-bi.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ZdOQq6bqitI for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3B61F439D9 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n186so133273141wmn.0 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:58:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=meteorite-bi.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=CXSaJezFFsgxDzLIcgazer5HL5xgqSpRJMQvZXlXw7Q=; b=PD4QtedYaXVcy10i1edchSdMqdK/37BtRUlkWDZ7S2o+3tjUfiUfDjHI7l4+TD26M2 saznRbDoIpwSD919a4HdR5rR+MSUQYG1MVypoplXeac1+Op9ANiGWp/C4CHdHnJ7JYaY FilSHn/l692VRoplj69UTZQBowPhCsX9QtT8ixFJRGG6bRMsO65y7BhOwG5SlJU6seTD hbWZDRMQULXAbV/NQj8+vXO/7D7JvqhaYPAJls6HJH5WBWGW7BR+rTis1CHT1OeD7Ivw t80Tq9Xlg5qRJ32ZT7EOUwBfLzFfTLg+NmjfkdYNWp9CNmZR7YZcyh5gi57yD69pcOft oMMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=CXSaJezFFsgxDzLIcgazer5HL5xgqSpRJMQvZXlXw7Q=; b=OK1JN1kPZVAUaaSM+k1/1hTM5Jg0LsyQYerR7tEUMfiUf0SNL/J/qbuOp1+eCBlHYh ZXeyPFzSl9AoGc3y8ggfGee3rVHvr7w7gGm2fr6BnweVE7yewI+/Pqb+UbBj62squHGe 0bJepGnGAnbGPOvnLlQv317YgUCaYfwCSUSnM03dLkWg3EZ6dOLA6I1HAn1WVQI/cFzm NFAt4adCE7dXRISGZdBqjDF7hQ2WDDfOIGJ9aPyHrTiZT5S9X6yk3C1ykP4hmhIxXT1l QNUxmAsxOgKvDnPU1SYMpbZ8zZkTOnMufODvCJPblGMs0nB2br/r5VMbJWtS8ab+QUfA RE1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1fhZ7/9zsHpopprSZSQNN1oBePZj4zgzSMXYRYrRfRXgDOi1JlZNTmUPRBVwufMTXO7BSpAfMyHVOjIU0seXchnZeMw== X-Received: by 10.28.146.18 with SMTP id u18mr10077670wmd.72.1450259887939; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:58:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.22.6 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:57:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom Barber Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:57:48 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release OODT 0.11 To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11442bb8740607052700f182 --001a11442bb8740607052700f182 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, but the delete issue needs fixing first, not being able to delete products is pretty high on the bad stakes. I've been dealing with sick kids all week but if no one else fixes it by the end of the week I'll take a look when I get 30 minutes. Tom On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > We've addressed 87 issues since 0.10. > I think a 0.11 release would be good. I would like to revisit the Avro RPC > work again after that with the aim of merging in to or even into a > 1.0. > What does everyone think? > Lewis > > -- > *Lewis* > --001a11442bb8740607052700f182--