Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC979183F1 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91069 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2015 16:40:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 91034 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2015 16:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@oodt.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@oodt.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 91017 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2015 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 16:40:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DE0B5C3F29 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:40:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=meteorite_bi.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KDJmhLe6p5tV for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3FF3C2160F for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so46313731wme.1 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 08:40:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=meteorite_bi.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ylqnAcesuFXcTA4JAjqAXCjFAzGYNKBRBTidahWKmXE=; b=rWvQVf2aTNZEh9MfbX4NQcM+wdDACMshweM9Bn5U9mHlG4XfmgBm+GfUNw/SvFNam1 BQHQBdarI0dez9RFaTbHenMGS8riZ0JR+ivmagKE+l5BNE8pGVODhtkffmai3PiBN5e2 cZrDnUzJHGvfbWJPPtwrXGxDwLREnVpsXTYygu86gpvTm9t89n24Pshm1L1MZOQuthvA KxoT9BJMC/KyFMFcC7mzhCuhbQfejpLkmcZxR9yBdejfAGT3xk6xMfHgEg/+YKVIupTK bR/hl4EvnbpmUCixVh8Fywc6P4z07qyp5cABRoWJyyimKgLQngplEomzH+DIVKWFQa0T xSpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ylqnAcesuFXcTA4JAjqAXCjFAzGYNKBRBTidahWKmXE=; b=eMlajQyGNRwLRi0kH33mf+eu7B8KgsZaxR+b9D2NrIqxWExasbEeTGgTlBSWJvZfpa uuiZeZa3yfiFypB9BABkweRdsI+rKAxRybInr8Cp+bK4oYv2qYPHJrPbn7OdQ+UvV+3A J0AQp3gd47jSSrG0Lk4FksMSQHlvxhG0WPJTZeBGlVVLuTW4RgkGHxykRHezXs5pUX+2 S04WmFtwb67Z8C4wwlSFzIWEOxmnT954T3MG2LeE0VcBNn187D/miDTv/kGq3WkXhwir VORZA311xpyN1x2Vcp4jUX2iRENU4rccgZMWkmzZCY0XHiTJDxj/mMy0bUl6rkH9wKV0 rhtw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/kYqhDmVqTCXBYGE472L7+19ZBgJYDOHaiXkRthsAU35Jwnb9sBpMPN07lClOZ42pfMlo X-Received: by 10.28.13.78 with SMTP id 75mr28686976wmn.24.1446655216942; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 08:40:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.52.142 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:39:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom Barber Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:39:57 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Avro RPC stuff To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1144374251b2080523b9aaaf --001a1144374251b2080523b9aaaf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fair enough I'll leave it those who know! (Still just continuing on my quest to dump XML-RPC and run for the hills! ;) ) I also don't want Radu's stuff just get forgotten about or so out of sync its wasted, especially as you're talking about OODT 2 when we haven't even got 1 shipped yet! ;) On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Yes, they are interfaced up. No it=E2=80=99s not a simple pick and > choose everywhere since the parts for selecting the underlying > transport are sometimes configurable, and other times hard coded > last I looked. > > Also I think we can effectively split and simply not interface this > and leave 1.x and 0.x as the XML-RPC lines, and eventually deprecate > XML-RPC in 2.x (Avro) and just move to an Avro only thing. Maintaining > both and having the communication layer interfaced up is a nightmare. > > My 2c. > > Cheers, > Chris > > =E2=80=94 > Chris Mattmann > chris.mattmann@gmail.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Barber > Reply-To: > Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 8:34 AM > To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" > Subject: Re: Avro RPC stuff > > >Booo! > > > >Aren't they just interfaced up and you pick either XMLRPC or Avro? > > > > > > > >On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Chris Mattmann > >wrote: > > > >> Hey Guys, > >> > >> IMO this is a post 1.0 Apache OODT release. > >> I=E2=80=99d like to do a full triage of e.g., the OODT-491 > >> stuff, get as much of that committed as possible; > >> also the typing stuff for File Manager, and a couple > >> other bells and whistles. > >> > >> This will fundamentally change and is backwards non-compat > >> if we move to Avro. For example an 0.x and/or 1.x OODT > >> client or server won=E2=80=99t be able to talk to a 2.x OODT Avro > >> client/server. > >> > >> Also this needs to be tested e.g, in an ImageCat, DRAT, > >> and/or mission scenario to make sure it fully works as > >> expected before a merge into master. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> =E2=80=94 > >> Chris Mattmann > >> chris.mattmann@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney > >> Reply-To: > >> Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 8:25 AM > >> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" > >> Subject: Re: Avro RPC stuff > >> > >> >The Pom.xml rearranging screwed me a few weeks back. > >> >I've got a patch locally to sort this ot and will commit then drag th= e > >> >avro > >> >RPC branch up to date with trunk. > >> >What we need to do is properly scope out what needs to be done to > >>finish > >> >this task off. > >> >Radu, > >> >Are you able to write here what you think is required to finish the > >>task > >> >off please? > >> >Thanks > >> > > >> >On Wednesday, November 4, 2015, Tom Barber > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hey Lewis/Radu > >> >> > >> >> Where are we on this? Anything I can do to help drag it into the > >>land of > >> >> the living? > >> >> > >> >> Tom > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> >*Lewis* > >> > >> > >> > > > --001a1144374251b2080523b9aaaf--