oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Radu Manole <manole.v.r...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Move Apache OODT SCM to Apache Git
Date Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:42:22 GMT
Great to hear that!

Could also make it so that the Apache review board can take git diffs?
Thanks.

2015-09-30 10:12 GMT+03:00 Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:

> All of this can be addressed at the following issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-883
> Lewis
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Valerie,
> > I've updated a bit of documentation tonight on the OODT website but the
> > migration guide needs to be finished off and made available.
> > I'll work on this tomorrow and update... for now bed.
> > Thanks
> > Lewis
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Mallder, Valerie <
> > Valerie.Mallder@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Could someone write up a tutorial on using git for the OODT repository?
> >> I know there are generic tutorials out there, but one that is specific
> to
> >> using git for OODT will be appreciated.  Also, some hints on how to use
> >> (and best way to use for OODT) whatever great features git has that
> caused
> >> you to switch over to it in the first place would be very helpful.
> >>
> >> A little help for the git-impaired would be appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> Valerie A. Mallder
> >> New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer
> >> Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: kelly@apache.org [mailto:kelly@apache.org]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:37 AM
> >> > To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Move Apache OODT SCM to Apache
> Git
> >> >
> >> > > Can as many people as possible please check out the read only .git
> >> > > repos at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt.git
> >> > > We need to verify that it looks as expected, we have not lost any
> >> > > branches, trunk is up-to-date, etc.
> >> >
> >> > Looks good to me.
> >> >
> >> > --k
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message