oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mallder, Valerie" <Valerie.Mall...@jhuapl.edu>
Subject RE: 0.9-rc1 tag name
Date Tue, 09 Jun 2015 17:21:50 GMT
Here's the visual ... my jaw in totally on the floor.  It never occurred to me that something
named 'release candidate' would be an 'official' release.  So, this explains why I spent a
good two weeks trying to get 0.8.1 to work, couldn't get it working, and ended up backing
out all of my stuff and going back to 0.8 because I knew how to get that version working.
 I had absolutely no idea that 0.8.1-rc1 was the REAL release of 0.8.1.  The release was called
'0.8.1' so I checked everything out from the 0.8.1 tag.  

I would hate for someone to make the same mistake I did. I get that svn tags are separate
from maven version numbers. But, being consistent with things like this is rarely a 'bad'
thing to do, and often times, it really helps. Especially for new people who are not familiar
with the system and just trying to understand it.  If I could make a recommendation to the
next RM it would be to do something like:

Make a 1.0-rc1 - does everyone like it? No
Make a 1.0-rc2 - does everyone like it? No
Make a 1.0-rc3 - does everyone like it? Yes
Make a 1.0  (this is just a copy of 1.0-rc3, but it is absolutely clear what release it really
is)

This would address the desire to save a history of all the release candidates (not sure why
you need that, but ok), and provide the user with a release that is clearly not a 'candidate'
for release, but something that has actually 'been' released.

Nonetheless, Thanks for letting me know.  I will never again assume that the svn tag matches
the release name.  How silly of me!  




Valerie A. Mallder
New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer
Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattmann@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 11:51 AM
> To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9-rc1 tag name
> 
> Ahh, yeah it’s b/c the tag doesn’t necessarily have to match the version # - Maven
> versions are separate from SVN tag #s are separate from..well you get it :)
> 
> I think while it may be divorced from the actual build system in some minor way,
> one thing that it does provide is provenance of how many RCs we’ve had to do
> and in the past it’s usually 1, but we’ve had cases, where it’s been 2 or 3 and
we’ve
> lost the provenance if it’s just <X.Y> version (but what RC?)
> 
> Anyhoo, I digress - hopefully 0.10 is just, well, 0.10. The next RM if it’s not me,
is
> welcome to decide. ^_^
> 
> Cheers
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Mallder, Valerie" <Valerie.Mallder@jhuapl.edu>
> Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 8:23 AM
> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: 0.9-rc1 tag name
> 
> >Ok, it's just inconsistent with the release number that is on all the
> >jar files, etc. So it has the potential to cause confusion.  It
> >confused me because when I went to run the radix script just now, (not
> >knowing entirely how everything works) I wasn't sure if I needed to
> >change the version that is specified in the script to be 0.9-rc1 instead of 0.9.
> >Just sayin ... :)
> >
> >
> >
> >Valerie A. Mallder
> >New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer Johns Hopkins
> >University/Applied Physics Laboratory
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:38 AM
> >> To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: 0.9-rc1 tag name
> >>
> >> Hi Val,
> >>
> >> Nope, tags are immutable, so keeping it that way. I decided to
> >>include the RC this  time (have done so in some prior releases).
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> +++++
> >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> >> Chief Architect
> >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet
> >> Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> >> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> >>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> +++++
> >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University
> >> of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> +++++
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: <Mallder>, Valerie <Valerie.Mallder@jhuapl.edu>
> >> Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org>
> >> Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 7:31 AM
> >> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org>
> >> Subject: 0.9-rc1 tag name
> >>
> >> >Hi Chris,
> >> >
> >> >Is the current tag '0.9-rc1' going to change to '0.9'?
> >> >
> >> >Val
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Valerie A. Mallder
> >> >New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer Johns Hopkins
> >> >University/Applied Physics Laboratory
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> >> >>[mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:06 AM
> >> >> To: Mallder, Valerie; dev@oodt.apache.org
> >> >> Cc: Wyngaard, Jane R (3980-Affiliate); Starch, Michael D (398M);
> >> >>Kristian ZARB  ADAMI; Ramirez, Paul M (398M); Alessio Magro
> >> >> Subject: Re: OODT Documentation
> >> >>
> >> >> Sigh, sorry Val:
> >> >>
> >> >> [chipotle:~/tmp/oodt0.9] mattmann% svn commit -m "Finally fully
> >> >>implement
> >> >> OODT-785 and get the batch stub legacy mode props in there. Thanks
> >> >>to Val."
> >> >> Sending
> >> >>
> >> >>mvn/archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/resmgr/
> >> >>src
> >> >>/ma
> >> >>in
> >> >> /resources/bin/batch_stub
> >> >> Transmitting file data .
> >> >> Committed revision 1684425.
> >> >> [chipotle:~/tmp/oodt0.9] mattmann%
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Looking at:
> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1637785
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I see that this was only done and committed in the resmgr code for
> >> >>trunk and not  in OODT RADIX. Anyways, above I just committed it in
> >> >>RADIX. Ugh, sorry for that.
> >> >> Happy to make a point release if needed for an 0.9.1.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Chris
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> +++++
> >> >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> >> >> Chief Architect
> >> >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA
> >> >> Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> >> >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> >> >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> >> >> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> >> >>
> >>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> +++++
> >> >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> >> >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >> >>
> >>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> +++++
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: <Mallder>, Valerie <Valerie.Mallder@jhuapl.edu>
> >> >> Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 6:59 AM
> >> >> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org>, jpluser
> >> >><chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov>
> >> >> Cc: "Wyngaard, Jane R (3980-Affiliate)"
> >> >><Jane.R.Wyngaard@jpl.nasa.gov>,  "Starch, Michael D (398M)"
> >> >><Michael.D.Starch@jpl.nasa.gov>, Kristian ZARB  ADAMI
> >> >><kza@astro.ox.ac.uk>, "Ramirez, Paul M (398M)"
> >> >> <paul.m.ramirez@jpl.nasa.gov>, Alessio Magro <lessju@gmail.com>
> >> >> Subject: RE: OODT Documentation
> >> >>
> >> >> >If you are using the RADiX archetype, make sure the following two
> >> >> >lines are in the batch_stub script The batch_stub script is
> >> >> >located
> >>at:
> >> >> >oodt/resmgr/bin.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-Dorg.apache.oodt.cas.pge.task.metkeys.legacyMode="true" \
> >> >> >-Dorg.apache.oodt.cas.pge.task.status.legacyMode="true" \
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I just checked here
> >> >> >
> >> >> >http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/oodt/tags/0.9-rc1/mvn/archetypes/rad
> >> >> >ix/
> >> >> >src
> >> >> >/ma
> >> >>
> >> >>>in/resources/archetype-resources/resmgr/src/main/resources/bin/bat
> >> >>>ch_
> >> >>>stu
> >> >>>b?
> >> >> >view=markup
> >> >> >
> >> >> >and see that it batch_stub in the RADiX archetype is still
> >> >> >missing those two lines.  JIRA issue OODT-785 is marked fixed in
> >> >> >0.8, but it was never been implemented in the RADiX archetype.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Val
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Valerie A. Mallder
> >> >> >New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer Johns Hopkins
> >> >> >University/Applied Physics Laboratory
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> From: Andrea DeMarco [mailto:dr.andrea.demarco@gmail.com]
> >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:44 AM
> >> >> >> To: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> >> >> >> Cc: Wyngaard, Jane R (3980-Affiliate); Starch, Michael D
> >> >> >>(398M); Kristian ZARB  ADAMI; Ramirez, Paul M (398M); Alessio
> >> >> >>Magro; dev@oodt.apache.org
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: OODT Documentation
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hi Chris,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yup, the jar file is present in both resmgr/lib and workflow/lib.
> >> >> >>You can have a look  at my JAR contents at:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>https://www.dropbox.com/s/1h0siibxf8sv5ut/fileconcatenator-pge-1.0.
> >> >> >>jar
> >> >> >>?dl
> >> >> >>=0
> >> >> >>  - perhaps something's off there?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> >> Andrea
> >> >
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message