Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6226F175B8 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 01:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23272 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2014 01:01:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 23237 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2014 01:01:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@oodt.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@oodt.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 23225 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2014 01:01:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 01:01:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AC_DIV_BONANZA,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.180] (HELO mail-lb0-f180.google.com) (209.85.217.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 01:01:44 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n15so191971lbi.25 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:01:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JGpC78f3lSR369sHd9dPkVOvO9Gk3LmtOnxVtjtvWZk=; b=xgPDQTcXCRIIe/rmI2jbIqx33pEC7Le5PTeNcFmeWc80B37jCZTT/SJP0k0PGN2/po Q/aSYZLAqLNVZJnVqvQhsxVBwaCw4t42k9QjT5FMBiTX5VcNnS0vLhX5xqLoPXLHthmT Btm8jNL9H+HHojvkgrX3A3xlffLC/2NA4da7uSnISFJNu3mX3CQpYW0FuOISCUapoZld UZKgrWVVfJQDdLymBunixTBlviXFbTU82ECVRIrs23bR2S5I8cbT4OeVoNLH06G6hnUv Xo3/EppFRzsb79J3K/693IyfLtoaTyCC/ab+kfKL2U9OlSsptz74KHZSJlRhKrcTgsCX luWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.189.103 with SMTP id gh7mr14126796lbc.18.1412816483153; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.172.36 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:01:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:01:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A Suggestion on Developing Documentation Based on the History of Experimentation From: Lewis John Mcgibbney To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" Cc: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c376b29c82be0504f2f8d6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c376b29c82be0504f2f8d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Bruce, Documentation has been stripped. Can you make this available somewhere else? Thank you v much. Lewis On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Bruce Barkstrom wrote: > During the last month, I managed to get a fairly difficult installation > task > to work on software I felt I had a critical need for. I've attached the > documentation I wrote as I went through the experience describing > what I had to do. I think we often denigrate writing documentation at > the level of detail in the attached document as dealing with "newbies" > who are a bit below our level of disciplinary attainment. > > Based on my experience, it's more appropriate to regard the documentation > as showing the kind of professional level of instructions surgeons exhibit > when they write down a procedure for other surgeons to learn how to do. > We don't think surgeons should write down what they're doing in a one page > summary intended for managers. Managers don't have the training to know > what kind of stitches to make that will hold a suture against a surging > artery. > If you ever have to have surgery (or have a person you care for undergo > surgery) you want that surgeon to know the details of what he or she is > doing, to understand the risks of the procedure, to have plans for dealing > with the most common exceptions, and to close up the wound without > losing things. This isn't work for "newbies" -- it's a professional > commitment > we make to try to pass on what we've learned so people coming after us > don't have to work so hard and make as many mistakes as we did. > > I think it would be helpful to take the exception handling procedures we've > had to go through with Valerie and other folks on OODT and use the record > (in e-mail and maybe elsewhere) to write up a professional summary of the > procedures an inexperienced OODT user would have to follow to successfully > install OODT and get it to work. I didn't enjoy working through the > rationale > for why you couldn't just rely on the Debian Linux packages for the AdaCore > GNAT GPL installation. The same thing is true of the CAS PGE Crawler task. > > It is absolutely critical to help new (and even experienced) users navigate > the treacherous path from starting out to successful and (relatively) error > free operation. The success of other folks in installing OODT is going to > depend on getting the maintenance cost down to the LOCKSS level of > a person-hour per month. > > Let's see what we can do to make this happen. If we can, OODT will be > a singular example. If we do, it won't be luck, it'll be the really hard > work > we put in. Our reward will be clear and it won't depend on how many grants > we get or how many NASA medals we earn. We'll know it - and that will > suffice. > > Bruce B. > -- *Lewis* --001a11c376b29c82be0504f2f8d6--