Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 915A311090 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 06:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18631 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2014 06:02:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 18593 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2014 06:02:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@oodt.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@oodt.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 18581 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2014 06:02:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 06:02:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.52] (HELO mail-qg0-f52.google.com) (209.85.192.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 06:02:16 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f51so1090265qge.39 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 23:01:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZFvYJKiFUWqdnQkagERUNtqQMjLvJ7AIwmO+Kx7xSfM=; b=le85UyHvvdsT7zl+VgGzghi2yOP1aNPzRj6Sl8Kgw0WelKqVrVWclCu/Prc8TZ30oY ydTTxmbTtWbOOU7KC9hHoGw4K5S9Jw6wdAKVUE0NlSgSt+hXmAMaygrITDW7eemCN5CR pECojfQiqMuzb/Y8r2prK/pG/z/yEoAvJ5NP0iAsPVwzKYqf/pM7hZKD6/d99bfTVyX3 Abg0cOzFHLdcKoSJo1pPRNTtNXUl/SpjKXPlw2C9fKAzrvoUQJ7f9nukfwjYWv//2cKS lhv5E9jFqILPgutWSM8NFMwUhgwc3/8kMT9nRUKD2dbgYQM7GwsEQuqdBd9A3BQSV/Yv eFXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.134.201 with SMTP id k9mr15010627qat.59.1404453712291; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 23:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.22.168 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 23:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.22.168 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 23:01:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 02:01:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cas-product .war artifact huge From: Lewis John Mcgibbney To: dev@oodt.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d25a89fee5d04fd57dc11 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d25a89fee5d04fd57dc11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 As a wannabe hacker ;) of OODT sometimes I find build downloads timing out... this has been observed on Jenkins as well. Any mechanism for reducing the size of this particular artefact would be very helpful. I notice that cxf is pulled transitively via some hadoop artifacts as well so I'm also very much guilty of pulling then being left with the task of cleaning up project builds. Thanks for anything you can do here Ross. Great. Lewis. On Jul 3, 2014 7:44 PM, "Ross Laidlaw" wrote: > Hi Chris & Lewis, > > I think Chris is right, probably it's the Apache CXF dependencies that > have increased the WAR size. As Chris suggested, I'll try to learn about > Sergey's solution for Tika to see if we can do something similar for the > CAS Product webapp. > > Ross > > > > > On 1 Jul 2014, at 04:54, Lewis John Mcgibbney > wrote: > > > > I think we should consider that. > > That is a bit of a beast and is a waste of resources, storage and > bandwidth > > if it is not required. > > If we can avoid this then I think we should. > > Thanks for response. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Chris Mattmann < > chris.mattmann@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> @Ross Laidlaw can answer this - I'm thinking the CXF integration? > >> Note -- this can be adapted as Sergey B in Tika has shown in some > >> thread that we can just dep on the minimal jar for CXF > >> > >> ------------------------ > >> Chris Mattmann > >> chris.mattmann@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney > >> Reply-To: > >> Date: Monday, June 30, 2014 8:10 PM > >> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" > >> Subject: cas-product .war artifact huge > >> > >>> Hi Folks, > >>> Anyone have a clue why the cas-product war artifact is 30,500KB in > size? > >>> Lewis > >>> > >>> -- > >>> *Lewis* > > > > > > -- > > *Lewis* > --047d7b5d25a89fee5d04fd57dc11--