oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Barkstrom <brbarkst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Might want to stay away from JDK7
Date Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:53:44 GMT
Thanks for taking heed of the warning.

I'll note that when I was participating in the GGF, the recommendations
required two
implementations of interfaces with the code being done in different
That would fit with our article on replication by increasing the paths to
and resilience - but at the cost of development resources and maintenance.
Nothing's free.

I'll mention that I'm off developing a "non-query" approach to matching
user capabilities
with the attributes of collections in Earth science Archives.  This even
includes doing
a private and off-line Web site in a CGI interface entirely in Ada and with
no XML.
The current design has one Web site for input and other Web sites for the
"reference interview"
of users and for "collection attribute matching".  I've come to realize
that I'm not really suited
to leading a group of people I have to monitor, since my understanding
works by
creating instantiations of ideas from first principles.  Or, to put it a
bit differently,
I develop code to understand a problem, not to fix a problem by using
procedures.  Since it's research, to hell with "requirements".  Or - in
different language - "no project requirements, no managerial overhead -
except what's
needed for understanding."

Bruce B.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

> Hey Guys,
> Bruce Barkstrom and several others off list have pointed out the following
> articles:
> Garber, L., 2012: Have Java's Security Issues Gotten out of Hand?,
> Computer, Dec. 2012, pp. 18-21.
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2013/01/11/homeland-security-disable-jav
> a-security-vulnerability/1828011/
> My suggestion would be to try and stick with earlier versions as it seems
> not to affect them though it may be a fundamental flaw in the actual
> language design, not sure yet.
> Just felt that it was worth noting.
> Thanks for listening.
> Cheers,
> Chris

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message