oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From B W <b.du...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Stakeholder Quality Attribute Scenarios
Date Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:10:00 GMT
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

> Hi BW,
>
> Here's my votes:
>
> On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:00 PM, B W wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to get the across the board OODT Scenarios addressing quality
> > attributes
> > that apply to Web-Grid context.
> >
> > I'm would basically like to get prioritization and any other feedback.
> >
> > There are 5 Scenarios, so 5x0.3= RoundUp(1.5) = 2 votes per person.
> >
> > Scenario 1
> > : Main Quality(s): Security, Configurability, Manageability
> > The OODT Framework will be able to be remotely configured for remote or
> > local administration.
> > : Component Context= All
> > : Priority: (H)igh
> > : Implementation Difficulty: (M)edium
> > : Primary Stakeholders = Acquirers, Sys Admin
> > : Priority Vote Count: 4
> Risk Concern: The password for admin config are not really encrypted?
>
Just base64 encoded?


> > Scenario 2
> > : Main Quality(s): Interoperability
> > The OODT Framework will be able to integrate with externally unique and
> > heterogeneous systems and interfaces.
> > : Component Context= All
> > : Priority: (H):
> > : Implementation Difficulty: (H)
> > : Primary Stakeholders = Acquirers, Developers, Maintainers
> > : Framework Priority Vote Count:  1
>
> >
> > Scenario 3: Main Quality(s): Modifiability, Manageability, Usability
> > The metadata and its associated product data will be managed separately.
> > : Component Context= All
> > : Priority: (H):
> > : Implementation Difficulty: (H) to (M)
> > : Primary Stakeholders = Acquirers, Developers, Maintainers
> > : Framework Priority Vote Count: 5
> >
> > Scenario 4: Main Quality(s): Performance, Scalability, Modifiability,
> > Manageability
> > Without degrading performance, the OODT Framework components will be
> able to
> > integrated with or removed from an existing and running OODT environment.
> > : Component Context= All
> > : Priority: (H):
> > : Implementation Difficulty: (M) to (L)ow
> > : Primary Stakeholders = Acquirers, Developers, Maintainers, Users
> > : Framework Priority Vote Count: 2
>
> >
> > Scenario 5: Main Quality(s): Usability
> > Users interested in scientific product data will be able to seamlessly
> > discover and retrieve scientific
> > product data from, possibly disparate and mutually exclusive,
> > organizational entities
> > that are using the OODT Framework.
> > : Component Context= All
> > : Priority: (H)igh:
> > : Implementation Difficulty: (H)igh
> > : Primary Stakeholders = Acquirers, Users, Developers, Maintainers
> > : Framework Priority Vote Count: 3
>
> Those are my priorities for the above scenarios. They look great. Others,
> please comment.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message