Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49248 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 04:33:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 04:33:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 30520 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 04:33:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-dev-archive@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 30467 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 04:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@oodt.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@oodt.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 30459 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 04:33:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 04:33:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sigep311@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 04:33:10 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so195178iwn.16 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:32:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h7/9rejRwbQ15uv28knAycKIII5cuokNmiDlOO4h8cI=; b=jP460dFybZkKvF3ym+1/qSrUuzxrwVIH/1qgH1lHuRFACoYdqgzieW7M5YZHzzCRNd YWPScmddVCoNZ/qjEKfPPlo59Rp7eyAZJuX4xbJkkrXp0odwFDxF5+MoDApWLmHPjEzh QO5YyTSuGxBa5JQeAv4Ha67dLXvga1HIXa+Zw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QKNGAqOVoM3Vb2oEp00eJ1zb6YmzGpswRvN9WgX13mwfUukBNOTBR3s6ERhjy1KDYp OasHSsPLh8H9bE5caYOpDCoP+6O795PscaWY6M//ZGeki31GWVfkA8DofrwSTRLe4SMD 34h1t/Q2MeurbaoAhJixzVahCHvOSA8X+uzjg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.1 with SMTP id v1mr1880396ibd.176.1295497968808; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.12.68 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:32:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20110119192014.54B9C23888CB@eris.apache.org> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:32:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branched components refer to nonexistent incubator version From: Cameron Goodale To: dev@oodt.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d5f0d3cf52c049a3fa037 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022152d5f0d3cf52c049a3fa037 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Paul, I have only seen SK give it a +1 so far. I wanted to run through the FileManager and Workflow components before I give my +1...it built ok (ignoring the maven stalls getting external jars) I just wanted to check a little deeper on the two components I am familiar with. Look for mine tomorrow morning. -Cameron On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) < paul.m.ramirez@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hey All, > > It was brought to my attention that I forgot to update the pom in some of > the branched components when I went around changing "0.2-incubating" to > "0.2". If I update this should I roll another RC? Anyhow, let me know. Also > JPL email is being weird and I haven't seen anyone else vote yet except SK. > > Thanks, > Paul -- Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String --0022152d5f0d3cf52c049a3fa037--