oodt-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Mattmann" <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject Re: couple more pom issues
Date Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:49:59 GMT
Guys the artifact ids make sense. I'll send a longer rely shortly but please don't change them
yet.

Cheers,
Chris 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "Woollard, David M (388J)" <David.M.Woollard@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:43:14 
To: oodt-dev@incubator.apache.org<oodt-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: "oodt-dev@incubator.apache.org" <oodt-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: couple more pom issues

Ah.. Yeah, I could be missing out on irc discussions... The one thing  
I can say is that the currect maven org doesn't reflect either  
discision, so there is still some work to do ;).

Dave

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:40 PM, "Sean Kelly" <kelly@apache.org> wrote:

> I mentioned in our chat room before how if we really did need to  
> impose some kind of organization then it ought to be done with the  
> namespace feature already provided by Java: the package declaration.  
> I can't recall why that idea fell out of favor, though.
>
> I'm +1 for dropping the prefixes.
>
>
> On 2010.Jul.22, at 9.13p, David M Woollard wrote:
>
>> I think this view conflicts with OODT-5 [1]. For my own two cents,  
>> I think simplicity should trump previous historical organization,  
>> so I would rather see the prefixes removed.
>>
>> Anyone else have an opinion on the subject?
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-5
>>
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>
>>> I believe the overall goal is to have two part names for all  
>>> modules:
>>>
>>> — cas-* for catalog/archive components
>>> — grid-* for traditional oodt profile & product components
>>> — oodt-* for common components
>>>
>>> So the correct dependency is cas-filemgr and the correct version  
>>> should be ${oodt.version}, aka 0.1-incubating.
>>>
>>> I think.
>>>
>>>
>>>> In addition to the jug/s problem Sean found, I have noticed that  
>>>> in two cases components (curator and crawler) depended on a  
>>>> filemgr-1.9-dev.jar rather than the cas-filemgr-0.1- 
>>>> incubating.jar. I have changed these over for the time being (see  
>>>> r966887 and r966889), but I wanted those more knowledgeable of  
>>>> these three components know.
>>>
>>
>
Mime
View raw message