oodt-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris A. Mattmann (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OODT-529) Lenient Lucene Catalog
Date Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:28:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13489140#comment-13489140
] 

Chris A. Mattmann commented on OODT-529:
----------------------------------------

Hey Luca, I'd be in favor of a property e.g., 

{noformat}
org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.catalog.lucene.allowDynFields
{noformat}

By default, to preserve back compat, this would be set to false. But, if set to true, then
the validation layer check for met fields would be removed, and would be replaced with Metadata.keys

Make sense?

                
> Lenient Lucene Catalog
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: OODT-529
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-529
>             Project: OODT
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: file manager
>    Affects Versions: 0.4
>            Reporter: Luca Cinquini
>            Assignee: Luca Cinquini
>             Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> There is often a need for ingesting and using metadata fields that are dynamically named,
rather than being exactly defined in an XML schema used by the CAS Validation Layer.
> We should either expand the current LuceneCatalog implementation to allow arbitrary fields,
or provide an alternative implementation that does so.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message