Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-oodt-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0F8E9094 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60709 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2012 03:45:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-oodt-commits-archive@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 60655 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2012 03:45:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@oodt.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@oodt.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@oodt.apache.org Received: (qmail 60630 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2012 03:45:43 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:45:43 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2271D141663 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:45:43 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris A. Mattmann (JIRA)" To: commits@oodt.apache.org Message-ID: <1141527986.17674.1339731943142.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <1667316202.21363.1336045730106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OODT-454) Crawler command line bugs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13295440#comment-13295440 ] Chris A. Mattmann commented on OODT-454: ---------------------------------------- Hey Tom! bq. I've just realised this issues is still open. Sorry! No worries! bq. An annoying question - do I keep the TriggerPostIngestWorkflow or use the UpdateWorkflowStatusToIngest? I would prefer that (for back compat perspective) we leave it as it was (UpdateWorkflowStatusToIngest). bq. Is there still time to close this issue before 0.4 release? Issue 1) has fallen away and I need to commit to resolve issue 2) and 3) (see the 3 issues in the Description). I would just set it for 0.5 unless you think this is critical for a respin. If you think so, just let pramirez know on the dev list and we can DISCUSS a respin. No worries if that's the case! Thanks man. > Crawler command line bugs > ------------------------- > > Key: OODT-454 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-454 > Project: OODT > Issue Type: Bug > Components: crawler > Affects Versions: 0.4 > Reporter: Thomas Bennett > Assignee: Thomas Bennett > Priority: Minor > Labels: patch > Fix For: 0.4 > > > I've think I've flushed out a few crawler command line bugs: > 1) --actionIds can currently fails when more than 1 actionId is specified > 2) ActionId Unique fails because the filemgrUrl is not set. > 3) ActionId TriggerPostIngestWorkflow is not configured correctly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira