oltu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: podling name search
Date Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:29:23 GMT
I think that, provided that we decide to change name, we should choose a
completely new one to avoid confusion between Leelo and Apache Amber.

+1 for a new name.
Tommaso

2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com>

>
> On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>
> > thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
> > the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
> > other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
> > OSS so it may be the case :-(
>
> Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber  comes from this search
>
> http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance
>
> Regards
>
> Antonio
>
>
> > What do others think?
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com>
> >
> >> Hi *,
> >>
> >> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
> >> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
> >>
> >> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
> >> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
> >> So we might need to change the final name... :S
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Antonio
> >>
> >>
> >> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message