oltu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pid *" <...@pidster.com>
Subject Re: podling name search
Date Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:37:16 GMT
+1 Yup I think so too.


On 7 Dec 2012, at 13:30, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that, provided that we decide to change name, we should choose a
> completely new one to avoid confusion between Leelo and Apache Amber.
>
> +1 for a new name.
> Tommaso
>
> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com>
>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>>
>>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
>>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
>>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
>>> OSS so it may be the case :-(
>>
>> Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber  comes from this search
>>
>> http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>>
>>> What do others think?
>>> Tommaso
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com>
>>>
>>>> Hi *,
>>>>
>>>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
>>>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
>>>>
>>>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
>>>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
>>>> So we might need to change the final name... :S
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message