oltu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Current pom versions
Date Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:33:51 GMT
Sounds good.

Raymond Feng
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 2, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi Raymond,
> 
> in general I kind of agree with you.
> The Core Oauth specification reached version 31 and should be the last one before being
an official RFC .
> 
> IMHO we should aim to version 0.31 and try to align to spec and eventually aim for a
1.0 release. Or alternatively we might aim directly to a 1.0 release
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Antonio
> 
> On Aug 2, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I start to question if it's a good idea to use the oauth spec version as the base
for Amber. There might be cases that make the scheme not so good:
>> 
>> 1. What if there are little code changes between two spec versions
>> 2. What if we need to fix certain things in Amber for a given spec version
>> 3. What if we implement more specs, such as OpenId connect
>> 
>> Btw, we can always document which spec level that an amber release implements.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi *,
>>> 
>>> after the release  the current SNAPSHOT version in our poms is
>>> 
>>> 0.23-incubating-SNAPSHOT 
>>> 
>>> According to our release semantic I was thinking to change it to be 0.31-incubating-SNAPSHOT
(as the version of the spec we are aiming for).
>>> 
>>> WDYT? Should we still keep that naming convention until we will release the 1.0
version or we can continue like this ?
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Antonio
> 

Mime
View raw message