oltu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving forward (proposal) [was: Questions for projects]
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:25:02 GMT
Wow, thank you very much Antonio for this huge effort!
I'll read and try to re-understand what happened.
Have a nice day,
Tommaso

2012/3/15 Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com>

> Hi all,
> to better understand the Leeloo/Newcastle University IP issue I have been
> dug further  the mailing list.
> I have thought to share with you my little "chronological report" we can
> use in order to prepare something consistent to ask to legal@ (btw did
> anybody tried to do that for this issue already?):
>
> 10/10 First mention of Leeloo [0]
> 11/10 Introduction of Leeloo to Amber list [1]
> 11/10 Moving Leeloo code to Apache repository [2]
> 12/10 Maciej/Lukasz signed ICLA [3]
> 12/10 IP clearance for Leeloo contribution [4]
> 12/10 AMBER-11/AMBER-12 Leelo donation
> 07/11 IP clearance and first release [5]
> 09/11 Waiting from reply from the University [6]
> 01/12 ASF license and copyrights [7]
>
>
> [0]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201010.mbox/%3C4CA5A544.3040407%40pidster.com%3E
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTi%3DEp6Df48aFZdB%2BmokAp6HO7-ncmoVdjELKnzwz%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [2]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTik3xt1H7nOaVGWPUSY9MrkKTPymffd%2BHT7r421A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [3]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikCGKnQkGj7wuHnFWoju%3DxbrO0%3DDMYWjkHfS%3DCK%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [4]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikHhU9gQKAJPtVfXOTrWJQM-XiTkSkBhQpWJfiz%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [5]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201107.mbox/%3CCAPz8h_XGY5gpMCqVyBxYBJ%2Bg%3DuDCgj-VPttNoKyEb5H4K7JR1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [6]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201109.mbox/%3CCA%2Bc2x_U%3DdtA9UpzpsvbrtNVypcqXEvvq6O8TEGY5D_bLm7ZXRQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [7]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201201.mbox/%3C4938690A-22C7-4677-8361-735D9A7E939D%40yahoo.com%3E
>
>
> Regards
>
> Antonio
>
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Antonio Sanso wrote:
>
> > Hi Simone
> >
> > On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> >
> >> Salut a tout le monde,
> >>
> >> didn't we accept external contributions to that part, once Leelo
> >> codebase was accepted?
> >> IIRC issues were filled and patches applied on oauth2, please correct
> >> me if I am wrong!
> >>
> >> As a side note: Leelo's guys submitted Leelo after submitting a
> >> SoftwareGrant,
> >
> > after digging a bit on the mailing list history I am not too sure about
> that (namely that software grant has been signed). See also [0]
> > Now as a next step, and here I'd ask the help of all, we'd need to
> collect any information on any document that has been signed,
> > in order to have something specific and precise to ask to legal@
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> >
> > [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e6rhs3tbsydal7i4
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message