oltu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raymond Feng <cyberf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving forward (proposal) [was: Questions for projects]
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:38:26 GMT
Hi, Antonio.

Thank you for putting together a nice timeline :-).

So basically, we are stuck at the IP clearance: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/amber-leeloo.html,
right?

Thanks,
Raymond

On Mar 15, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote:

> Hi all, 
> to better understand the Leeloo/Newcastle University IP issue I have been dug further
 the mailing list.
> I have thought to share with you my little "chronological report" we can use in order
to prepare something consistent to ask to legal@ (btw did anybody tried to do that for this
issue already?):
> 
> 10/10 First mention of Leeloo [0]
> 11/10 Introduction of Leeloo to Amber list [1]
> 11/10 Moving Leeloo code to Apache repository [2]
> 12/10 Maciej/Lukasz signed ICLA [3]
> 12/10 IP clearance for Leeloo contribution [4]
> 12/10 AMBER-11/AMBER-12 Leelo donation
> 07/11 IP clearance and first release [5]
> 09/11 Waiting from reply from the University [6]
> 01/12 ASF license and copyrights [7]
> 
> 
> [0] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201010.mbox/%3C4CA5A544.3040407%40pidster.com%3E
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTi%3DEp6Df48aFZdB%2BmokAp6HO7-ncmoVdjELKnzwz%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTik3xt1H7nOaVGWPUSY9MrkKTPymffd%2BHT7r421A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikCGKnQkGj7wuHnFWoju%3DxbrO0%3DDMYWjkHfS%3DCK%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikHhU9gQKAJPtVfXOTrWJQM-XiTkSkBhQpWJfiz%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [5] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201107.mbox/%3CCAPz8h_XGY5gpMCqVyBxYBJ%2Bg%3DuDCgj-VPttNoKyEb5H4K7JR1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [6] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201109.mbox/%3CCA%2Bc2x_U%3DdtA9UpzpsvbrtNVypcqXEvvq6O8TEGY5D_bLm7ZXRQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [7] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201201.mbox/%3C4938690A-22C7-4677-8361-735D9A7E939D%40yahoo.com%3E
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Antonio
> 
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Antonio Sanso wrote:
> 
>> Hi Simone
>> 
>> On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> 
>>> Salut a tout le monde,
>>> 
>>> didn't we accept external contributions to that part, once Leelo
>>> codebase was accepted?
>>> IIRC issues were filled and patches applied on oauth2, please correct
>>> me if I am wrong!
>>> 
>>> As a side note: Leelo's guys submitted Leelo after submitting a
>>> SoftwareGrant,
>> 
>> after digging a bit on the mailing list history I am not too sure about that (namely
that software grant has been signed). See also [0]
>> Now as a next step, and here I'd ask the help of all, we'd need to collect any information
on any document that has been signed, 
>> in order to have something specific and precise to ask to legal@
>> 
>> WDYT?
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Antonio
>> 
>> 
>> [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e6rhs3tbsydal7i4
>> 


Mime
View raw message