oltu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: tidying-up the SVN space
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:25:51 GMT
Hola,
The question I have is - and please take in consideration today I'm an
outdated OAuth guy :) - : how hard is putting 1.0a support in current
2.0 client?
TIA,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/



On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Tommaso Teofili
<tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/1/14 Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com>
>
>>
>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
>> > Ciao Antonio,
>> >
>> >>
>> >> unless I am doing something wrong it looks like I still do not have any
>> write/edit permission on the wiki.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I am worried you'll have to contact INFRA[1]
>> >
>> >> If I am not completely wrong some major sites (e.g. twitter) are still
>> using version 1.0a of the spec.
>> >> For this reason, if we want to gather any crowd to use Amber it would
>> be good to support at least client side also version 1.0a otherwise people
>> would be oriented to use some other Java libraries (e.g. Scribe).
>> >> The effort to do it for the client module should not be to huge, but
>> there is obviously an overhead.
>> >
>> > That sounds a more than valid reason to implement 1.0a - can you make
>> > a quick search to verify that please? TIA!
>>
>> Hi Simone, I can confirm Twitter is still using 1.0a .
>> As a general consideration I also think that there are much more users
>> interested to the client part than the one interested to the server part
>> (like me :)).
>>
>
> I agree that the client is an important part so I agree on the 1.0a
> implementation.
>
>
>> For this reason we could even think about a two phase release (first one
>> we focus on the client/common modules) and second we focus on everything
>> else.
>>
>
> I think the best way of doing that is putting down a quick roadmap of
> things to be done so that we can prioritize tasks and, eventually, split
> those items in different phases.
> BTW we are in the Incubator for a long time now so it'd be good to include
> also a release / graduation plan.
>
>
>> I hope you agree than one of our goal is to be mentioned here [0]and here
>> [1] in order to increase the project exposure.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>
> +1
>
> Tommaso
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>> [0] http://oauth.net/code/
>> [1] http://oauth.net/2/
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I would propose to add that implementation in the current 2.0 impl,
>> > rather than continue developing old stuff...
>> >
>> > best,
>> > -Simo
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> > http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message