oltu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AMBER-42
Date Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:32:07 GMT
Correct, that was the error I experienced.

Tommaso

2011/12/14 Raymond Feng <enjoyjava@gmail.com>

> Yes. You are right. The patch didn't contain the deletion.
>
> Raymond Feng
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Raymond,
> >
> > the error that Tommaso probably refers to are contained in the
> org.apache.amber.oauth2.integration.AccessTokenAssertion.
> > This class still contains some reference to the no more existing
> GrantType.ASSERTION.
> > If I am not mistaken though this class should not be there anymore in
> the first place (and probably is not anymore in your workspace, that is why
> you do not see any error).
> >
> > Just a guess
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> >
> > On Dec 14, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not seeing test failures in my local build. Please let me know what
> errors you ran into.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > Raymond Feng
> > rfeng@apache.org<mailto:rfeng@apache.org>
> > Apache Software Foundation Member
> > Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
> > Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
> > Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
> > ________________________________________________________________
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> >
> > Hello Antonio,
> >
> > I intended to commit it some days ago but it looked like there were some
> > integration tests failing due to it.
> > Since I wanted to double check it I postponed it a little, I am
> travelling
> > these days so I'll probably be able to review it in the first days of the
> > next week, if anyone of the committers is willing to do it before feel
> free
> > :)
> > Cheers,
> > Tommaso
> >
> > 2011/12/13 Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com>
> >
> > Hello Amber committers,
> >
> > I was wondering if any of the committer might take some action regarding
> > AMBER 42. I must highlight is not my patch and that there is not any
> > intention from my side to push/rush anything :)
> > The main reason that made me write this mail is the size of the patch
> > itself. While it is a really good patch (thanks Raymond for it) it is a
> > pretty big one.
> > If somebody with write SVN commit would review and apply it, it would be
> > really good (I have already put my non binding +1 after reviewing it ) .
> > This would allow other people to do new patches in an easier way without
> > overlapping with any of the several files included in the AMBER-42 patch.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBER-42
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message