ofbiz-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
Subject Re: Shippable Weight - r1720900 - OFBIZ-6777
Date Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:14:16 GMT
Hi Jacopo, Suraj, Ashish  and Paul,

Because there is no answer, I suppose it's a Vika's oversight? Else (even w/o answers) I'll
digg it...



Le 09/03/2018 à 01:56, Vikas Mayur a écrit :
> Is there anyone who could please confirm if this is bug and a ticket need
> to be opened? Sorry for any oversight on my side.
> Regards
> Vikas
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Vikas Mayur <vikasmayur@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I see this commit was done to fix the inconsistencies with the weight
>> column on the product. The product_weight is now used instead so if I am
>> not wrong migrating to OFBiz 16 from OFBiz 12 would require me to copy the
>> weight column to product_weight column and everything should magically
>> happen. Of-course I need to change the custom code to adapt to this change.
>> When I looked closer, the service 'recalcShippingTotal' make use of the
>> column shipping_weight (OrderReadHelper.getItemWeight()) instead.
>> So, my question is why would we use product_weight on order entry and
>> shipping_weight when an item is canceled to recalculate the order total?
>> Secondly, if product_weight is used in first place, what is the
>> significance of shipping_weight and which one should be used to calculate
>> the shipping options (shipping methods and shipping cost) in general?
>> Please let me know if I misunderstood the change.
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Regards
>> Vikas

View raw message