Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7e5b78ad-168b-fdcd-e002-5e267b2f3d95@les7arts.com>
References: <CAO2+CX0Rie8HLbTmtu3gw+BPr3QUycOStAN2hgHo6D9uyUvCeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ba29e6bc-5d69-92c6-dc09-f0decadc1ea3@les7arts.com> <CAO2+CX0PKWEdOAQZF_RjEDq7TYVgjH04A+Z+0B0FDK5+XXfRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPHhwd=UMu7Brwpog-2hmLC4Xg=H+EQpKC7jSDRoOAJip=w9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO2+CX3FjhKxHM-+QVe17dHnYKLx_VNTdm6z5AAukX8vuj_eqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEJSHEoWi9m3Yhzd_Vom7r_7Jy=SRt0y96yK_fJWPJ3bmmoxhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC0p8SnoC4KGPDDzAiKC4w2ShK8X_GGVgZ8pALo-inQuBnu8uQ@mail.gmail.com> <7e5b78ad-168b-fdcd-e002-5e267b2f3d95@les7arts.com>
From: Amit Gadaley <amit.gadaley@hotwaxsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:19:13 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJN6p1XcLsXoq2KP5zZe=M7Z=WrxWHS2ZH_w7VfJq817=NP95g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Use of single label for input fields
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d22c2936be8055a2709a7"
archived-at: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 07:50:01 -0000

--94eb2c0d22c2936be8055a2709a7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1 to Kenneth.

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:

> We sometimes use <fieldset> in Freemarker file and we have the
> <field-group> related thing in widget form (eg see
> https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/catalog/control/EditProd
> uct?productId=3DGZ-1000)
>
> IMO <field-group> should be used there and alike forms
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 25/09/2017 =C3=A0 16:11, Kenneth Paskett a =C3=A9crit :
>
>> Hello -
>>
>> In reviewing the markup around this code, I see that we are just using
>> <td>s with a <label>. When grouping related fields in a form, shouldn't =
we
>> be using <fieldset> <https://www.w3schools.com/TAgs/tag_fieldset.asp>
>> around the group of input and label tags, and then use the <legend> tag =
to
>> describe what the grouping is? If no box is desired around the fieldset,
>> CSS can be used to remove it.
>>
>> ~Kenneth
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:46 PM Sanjay Yadav <
>> sanjay.yadav@hotwaxsystems.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1. Good catch, Garima.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance
>>> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
>>> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
>>> 80, Scheme No. 78, Part II, Indore, M.P. 452010, India
>>> Mobile Phone: 787 918 8830 <(787)%20918-8830> | Linkedin: Sanjay-Yadav
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-yadav/>
>>>
>>> HotWax Systems recently received 8 mentions in *The Gartner Digital
>>> Commerce Vendor Guide, 2016 *by Gartner, Inc., the world's leading IT
>>> research and advisory company. Learn more about our research here
>>> <https://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/newslette
>>> rs/HotWax/1-2UVLP6M/index.html>
>>> .
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Garima Jain <jaingarima2094@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Devansu,
>>>>
>>>> I have seen in many screens this kind of practice followed in OFBiz
>>>> mostly
>>>> for the Email Address fields.
>>>> I have created the ticket for the same. Below is the link,
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9769
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Devanshu Vyas <
>>>> vyas.devanshu16@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Garima,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Catch! But I feel that this is a bug, not a designing practice(I
>>>>> hope).
>>>>> You should create a JIRA ticket for the same and if you find multiple
>>>>> occurrences of this kind of labels, then all can be fixed under it.
>>>>>
>>>>> If this is some kind of practice used in OFBiz, then I agree with you
>>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>>> we should not use titles for it.
>>>>> Looking forward to your reply.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>> Devanshu Vyas.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Garima Jain <jaingarima2094@gmail.co=
m
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Jacques,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want to explain if there are multiple input fields and all belong =
to
>>>>>>
>>>>> same
>>>>>
>>>>>> group/category(like address1, address2, city and state input fields
>>>>>>
>>>>> belong
>>>>>
>>>>>> to Address category) in a form then we can use a title for such type
>>>>>>
>>>>> of
>>>>
>>>>> categories. But, if there is only a single field (like Email address
>>>>>>
>>>>> has
>>>>
>>>>> single input field) then we should not use the title for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am also sharing the link of google drive which contains screenshot
>>>>>>
>>>>> with
>>>>
>>>>> detailed explanation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6et9_lt0zGVY3pXV2tmVmhtUjA/view?
>>>>>> usp=3Dsharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope this Helps!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>>>> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Garima,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry but I don't understand what you want to do, could you please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> give
>>>>
>>>>> us
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> more details
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 23/09/2017 =C3=A0 11:45, Garima Jain a =C3=A9crit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In OFBiz, some of the forms have a common group label that binds a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> set of input elements together under a group, like,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Shipping Address*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      - Address 1
>>>>>>>>      - Address 2
>>>>>>>>      - City
>>>>>>>>      - State
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is okay when we have multiple input fields in a group. But, i=
n
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> case
>>>>>
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> independent fields, there must be a single label that describes th=
e
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> field.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> like Email and its Input field.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the reference
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/sfa/control/NewLead
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Kind Regards*
>>>>>>>> Garima Jain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Kind Regards*
>>>>>> Garima Jain
>>>>>> =E2=80=8BEnterprise software Engineer
>>>>>> Hotwax Systems=E2=80=8B
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>


--=20
Thanks and Regards,
*Amit Gadaley <https://about.me/amit_gadaley>* | Senior Enterprise Software
Engineer
HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
<http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore=
,
M.P., India - 452010
Cell phone: +91 958.459.3069

<https://about.me/amit_gadaley?promo=3Demail_sig>

--94eb2c0d22c2936be8055a2709a7--