ofbiz-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: glossary enrichment proposal
Date Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:18:18 GMT
Thanks Rishi ,

I was actually looking for a total node list . no probs shall create one and
your info shall quicken the traversal.

regds
mallah.



On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolankii@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for the idea Rajesh.
>
> To answer your question, did you notice the child pages in the bottom?
>
> Here is quick reference;
> Page: Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=73634368
> >
> Page: E-commerce
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/E-commerce>
> Page: Financial Accounting and Reporting
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/
> Financial+Accounting+and+Reporting>
> Page: Human Resources Management
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/
> Human+Resources+Management>
> Page: Manufacturing
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Manufacturing>
> Page: Order Fulfillment Process
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/
> Order+Fulfillment+Process>
> Page: Party <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Party>
> Page: Product Information Management (PIM)
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=46631782
> >
> Page: Sales Order Management
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Sales+Order+Management>
> Page: Supply Chain Planning
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Supply+Chain+Planning>
> Page: Warehouse Management
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Warehouse+Management>
>
>
> Rishi Solanki
> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> Direct: +91-9893287847
> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> www.hotwax.co
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.rajesh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > can someone conversant with confluence/wiki point me to list of *all*
> pages
> > created under
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/
> > Business+Process+Reference+Book
> >
> > else i have to create the list in the hard way (manually).
> >
> > regds
> > mallah.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ankit Joshi <
> > ankit.joshi@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for the Idea.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Ankit Joshi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Rajesh Mallah <
> mallah.rajesh@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Shivangi ,
> > > >
> > > > pls find replies inline.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar <
> > > > shivangi.tanwar@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for the idea.
> > > > >
> > > > > Few More Suggestions:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business
> > processes
> > > > or
> > > > > OFBiz components. For Example, inventory can have business terms
> like
> > > > ATP,
> > > > > QOH, Back Order etc.
> > > > > 2) We can also incorporate business terminologies used in real
> world.
> > > So,
> > > > > people can relate those terms to the framework.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Both the above requirements are covered in a generic manner via
> various
> > > > relationship
> > > > mechanism in  SKOS system , I am hopeful confluence would have some
> > > plugin
> > > > that
> > > > allows to leverage on that or some related technology or standard for
> > > > maintaining vocabs
> > > > and semantic relations between terms  . ( I  would explore at some
> > point
> > > )
> > > >
> > > > SKOS article ( 2-3 mins reading time ).
> > > >  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Knowledge_
> > > > Organization_System#Concepts
> > > >
> > > > I also observe that certain SKOS concept are already in use in
> Catalog
> > >
> > > > Thesaurus application.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I would like to contribute to this glossary enrichment effort
> > too.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sure ! & thanks  , its being done as a Wiki page only. As a matter
of
> > > fact
> > > > contribution and enrichment to definitions should done by banking
> upon
> > > > existing definitions and on knowledge which can be borrowed on
> reliable
> > > > sources . (no point re-inventing , definitions , we have to put it in
> > > > context
> > > > of ofbiz only ).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > regds
> > > > mallah.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Shivangi Tanwar
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Devanshu Vyas <
> > > > vyas.devanshu16@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I like the idea, +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > Devanshu Vyas.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah <
> > > > mallah.rajesh@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi ,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles
> but
> > > > > > > the interpretation of the term may be  open or approximate
to
> > > various
> > > > > > > stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We already have a glossary page
> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/
> Glossary
> > > > > > > But it is not very exhaustive yet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was planning to go through the BPRB pages and prepare
a list
> of
> > > all
> > > > > > > technical terms used in various pages for the purpose of
> > enriching
> > > > > > > (extending) the glossary.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I invite opinions on whether it is worth ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My Arguments in favour:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (1) We need a common plane for definitions, if there is
a
> > disparity
> > > > > > between
> > > > > > >       author's interpretation of a business term and the
> reader's
> > > or
> > > > > > >       reviewer's interpretation there shall be a communication
> > gap.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (2) For newbies it is a great resource  because it increases
> > their
> > > > > > >       knowledge as well as ability of understanding more
> > > > > articles/pages.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (3) consistency of articles: if all authors/contributors
use
> the
> > > same
> > > > > > > terminology
> > > > > > >       then the content created by them shall relate to
each
> other
> > > in
> > > > a
> > > > > > more
> > > > > > >       consistent manner.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Implementation notes:
> > > > > > > ----------------------------
> > > > > > > currently we have our glossary in a flat list format with
is
> the
> > > > > easiest
> > > > > > > way
> > > > > > > to get started. However as the volume of terms and
> documentation
> > > > > > increases
> > > > > > > we shall also require to organise the glossary in a more
> > methodical
> > > > > way.
> > > > > > > Some of the relevant standards are W3C standards like SKOS
> [1]  ,
> > > > > OWL[2].
> > > > > > > I am not sure if confluence has components that allow
> organising
> > > > > > vocabulary
> > > > > > > at this moment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Even if its' not there we can continue to enrich the Glossary
/
> > > Vocab
> > > > > in
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > simple
> > > > > > > manner (and later migrate/upgrade it).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > References:
> > > > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/intro
> > > > > > > [2] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message