Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B349C2009E8 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B1CD4160A19; Mon, 30 May 2016 07:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 03EE8160A16 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 93554 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2016 07:39:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 93542 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2016 07:39:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2016 07:39:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5DAE4C2752 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 07:39:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.965 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.965 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZOj3x0q0c1wY for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 07:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.openfarm.fr (mx1.openfarm.fr [213.215.11.10]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 979965F237 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 07:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.openfarm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AFB2148D for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:39:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at OPFHBG003.hosting.openfarm.fr Received: from mx1.openfarm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OPFHBG003.hosting.openfarm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tRE4kHy4VUcR for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:39:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.25] (br137-5-78-234-239-30.fbx.proxad.net [78.234.239.30]) (Authenticated sender: julien.nicolas@nereide.fr) by mx1.openfarm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0363F21474 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: {MARKETING] New OFBiz Logo for Website To: user@ofbiz.apache.org References: <1464424091162-4681769.post@n4.nabble.com> <574965E7.1090402@nereide.fr> <1464430443354-4681774.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Julien NICOLAS Organization: =?UTF-8?B?TsOpcsOpaWRl?= Message-ID: <574BEE20.6000003@nereide.fr> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 09:39:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1464430443354-4681774.post@n4.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 30 May 2016 07:39:18 -0000 The first point is yes, we need to have a svg version (it's not a problem, I could manage to have it). But I was thinking about using OFBiz font for marketing materials. Maybe, if anybody knows the font name of OFBiz Logo, it could be easier ^^ On 28/05/2016 12:14, Sharan-F wrote: > Hi Julien > > Are you saying we need to have a svg version of the logo? Or are you saying > that the font is the problem and we need to change it? > > Thanks > Sharan > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/MARKETING-New-OFBiz-Logo-for-Website-tp4681769p4681774.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.