Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42F53106A0 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86793 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2015 17:34:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 86764 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2015 17:34:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 86750 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2015 17:34:09 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 17:34:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CE06D18099B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:34:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.025 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.025 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6kWMfb6Ouq8P for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC1S32.hotmail.com (blu004-omc1s32.hotmail.com [65.55.116.43]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id ACD9C23040 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU406-EAS272 ([65.55.116.7]) by BLU004-OMC1S32.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:33:56 -0700 X-TMN: [EsLtw03F9KGcp6mWSgEpKN2teDxjlQdrHXaz7lz+mxA=] X-Originating-Email: [eucalyptussoftware@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Derek Lew To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Best approach for mobile app Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 01:33:49 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQABAgMEyy+Cd0fHh0cFXDJkM0T10wDOofO8ALBq13wAQ/ZcuKHEm+IA Content-Language: en-sg X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2015 17:33:56.0254 (UTC) FILETIME=[89BD9BE0:01D0EA5C] Hi all, What would be the approach on the Ofbiz server side? Using Restful? Am = looking at this = https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Export+service+using+RE= ST Stuck at this point: LocalDispatcher dispatcher =3D = GenericDispatcher.getLocalDispatcher("default",delegator); Cannot resolve GenericDispatcher. But it seems like Json already enabled, any example? Divesh, I am looking at this = https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ofbiz-on-smartphone/ Not familiar enough to install the server patches. Thanks. Derek -----Original Message----- From: Ravi Shekhar [mailto:rshekhar.in@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2015 1:21 AM To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Best approach for mobile app Hi Derek You can do Photo taking and GPS navigation in Hybrid as well as native. I have done a mobile project on Photo taking using Cordova-Crosswalk, = and its easy and portable to Android and iOS. Have seen some demo for = GPS navigation to via Cordova-ionic framework If you want to extend it to iOS too, and your requirement will not = extend beyond this (Photo taking and GPS), then IMHO, go for an = ionic-cordova hybrid model. But if you only want to target Android, and you need it very fast and = stable, go for a native app. P.S., now a days, with hardware catching up on mobile platform too, fast = is a relative term but native still looks more efficient and light as = compare to a hybrid app. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Brajesh Patel wrote: > Dear Derek, > > Both(Hybrid and native) type of application having merit and demerit > > 1) If you will chose hybrid then some time it will slow depend on=20 > server configuration, but you can manage UI according to your=20 > requirement, both UI and data will come from server only need to = display in web-view. > > 2) native application is very fast compare to hybrid, in native app=20 > just send internally request to get data , but need extra costing for=20 > dev, > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Divesh Dutta <=20 > divesh.dutta@hotwaxsystems.com > > wrote: > > > Not sure which is better approach. But definitely GPS and mobile=20 > > taking > can > > be achieved using Apache Cordova plugins if you go with mobile web > (HTML5) > > or you can say hybrid app approach. > > > > What do you mean by : > > I have taken a look at obfiz-on-smartphone, couldn=E2=80=99t get = the server=20 > > side patches to be loaded. Any advice? > > > > Thanks > > -- > > Divesh Dutta. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Derek Lew < > eucalyptussoftware@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a requirement for the GPS tracking and photo taking, would=20 > > > it be better for mobile web (HTML5) or native app approach? > > > > > > > > > > > > I have taken a look at obfiz-on-smartphone, couldn=E2=80=99t get = the=20 > > > server > side > > > patches to be loaded. Any advice? > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards. > > > > > > Derek Lew =E5=88=98=E7=BB=8D=E9=9B=84 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks > Brajesh Patel > skype: brajesh.patel11 > Cell:- +91 8750709907 > -- Regards Ravi.Shekhar --------------------------------------------