Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1493189B7 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88036 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2015 12:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 88008 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2015 12:09:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 87996 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2015 12:09:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:09:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 65F7CC01D9 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:09:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.193 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.193 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXMOqOfnyrkN for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 595B2206F0 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkdw123 with SMTP id w123so29257923qkd.0 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:mime-version :content-type; bh=VUGU/QlYuDD2/Kuvmhj7i04NB27sQirSohhBxwHMEJo=; b=utvaJ/7MvqQkY9VsqJNU3gTU7cWwkuBpqs+sMXuudnOI3vVnfDgNUnxOIjhlbyQbO/ d9iWa1VasWOfj1ggAnDCOF/5VaoQ8sgMasNzhallGhm6zpRTMut7pS96CEqQgK33CrQr OzzdXf1VTJFOc994NBTfssmmitzFDgnXftqKYGuNiyDkgE1TvJFvPsXQqRBFJ1SlCsDU tulSuOan1epyg3Y8wNv3YGk11SBI4ZXLdlQtiTL3BZ08oSEuv18/O4BdiYLzWfAr6TKH gcdZF2T6eOPJlH4u2ODyBwR7IKILzuE8jofFlXJxcvKq33cOE+LwY4Of0NHWA2p4iohv gkug== X-Received: by 10.55.24.193 with SMTP id 62mr11911767qky.63.1442664551495; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([65.116.171.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 128sm5653115qhe.9.2015.09.19.05.09.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Sep 2015 05:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 08:09:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Taher Alkhateeb To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Message-ID: <26100634.90.1442664548454.JavaMail.taher@elterro-sam-ultra> In-Reply-To: <1442656172383-4672228.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re:_[MARKETING]_OFBiz_New_Website_St?= =?utf-8?Q?ructure_Proposals_=E2=80=93_Feedback_Required?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_89_28023806.1442664548453" ------=_Part_89_28023806.1442664548453 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sharan,=20 Thank you again for the excellent work, the structure keeps getting better = and better. I have a few more suggestions that are "nice to have":=20 - I think it would still be better to remove or reduce the menu items such = as those in news and users and make that part of the page design and here i= s why:=20 - I think twitter feeds do not warrant their own full page. and I also don'= t see a lot of difference between blog and press.=20 - you can create either a filter, a header, or a table to show users by ind= ustry and even other categories inside the page.=20 - A lot of websites put lots of links into the footer area for lesser used = links and as a form of secondary navigation. So we do not need to have ever= ything that exists in the main menu necessarily.=20 so overall I would suggest that we always follow a "less is more" philosoph= y and make new menu items where it is necessary and makes sense.=20 With that being said, great job and I don't see a problem with going with t= his design immediately even without applying the above.=20 Cheers,=20 Taher Alkhateeb=20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharan-F" =20 To: user@ofbiz.apache.org=20 Sent: Saturday, 19 September, 2015 5:49:32 AM=20 Subject: Re: [MARKETING] OFBiz New Website Structure Proposals =E2=80=93 Fe= edback Required=20 Hi Everyone=20 This is my latest update for the proposed website structure. I=E2=80=99ve r= emoved=20 the second level menus and added notes about included specific links.=20 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Revised+Website+Structure= +v2=20 I=E2=80=99ve adjusted the menu sequence based on feedback from Taher and ot= hers, and=20 also completely removed =E2=80=98Solutions=E2=80=99 as a menu option since = we can=20 incorporate this within the home page itself.=20 I hope that this latest revision will be acceptable to the community and we= =20 can start working towards reaching a consensus. As usual please let me have= =20 your comments and feedback.=20 Thanks=20 Sharan=20 --=20 View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/MARKETING-O= FBiz-New-Website-Structure-Proposals-Feedback-Required-tp4671926p4672228.ht= ml=20 Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.=20 ------=_Part_89_28023806.1442664548453--