Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pierre.smits@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55094FF2.1070002@les7arts.com>
References: <55094FF2.1070002@les7arts.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:40:57 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CADPkm84gYW1rmxyEx=LSGgwRUYZrwiZvuNjZQjKeL3KQhy9++g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why we should use "Apache OFBiz" instead of OFBiz
From: Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com>
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34e46edb11f05118db7e7

--001a11c34e46edb11f05118db7e7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We should follow the guidelines set forth by the ASF Brand Management
office.

Apache OFBiz in all 'official' postings and OFBiz in informal
communications is acceptable.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:

> Just read this http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/17/8230631/microsoft-is-
> killing-off-the-internet-explorer-brand
>
> Notably
> << the power of using the Microsoft brand over just Windows or Internet
> Explorer, and showed off some research data on a new name for the company=
=E2=80=99s
> browser vs. Internet Explorer. Putting Microsoft in front of the new secr=
et
> name increased the appeal to some Chrome users in the UK. "Just by puttin=
g
> the Microsoft name in front of it, the delta for Chrome users on appeal i=
s
> incredibly high,">>
>
> It's intuitive but now we have data to prove it :)
>
> Jacques
>

--001a11c34e46edb11f05118db7e7--