Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pierre.smits@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <531DE2ED.1040607@gmail.com>
References: <531DE2ED.1040607@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:19:35 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CADPkm84CVc9705YsXFTXii_VbvkJuT_PHfTt9z2ddNxMfRbqKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Help clarifying proper use of production run quantity produced
 and rejected.
From: Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com>
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c288a2bc3e3c04f443ce04

--001a11c288a2bc3e3c04f443ce04
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Christian,

It seems to me that you are confusing yourself with your own reasoning....

Look at it from this simple and absolute perspective: when executing a
production run that results in the end product beer the outcome of that
intention is either beer (success) or no beer (failure). The rest is a
by-product. Defective end products don't exist. Just end products
(success), wanted by-products (e.g. waste - as in the bags the barley came
in -  or in the beer scenario yeast-residue) and unwanted by-products (the
stuff that you get when failed)

It also seem to me that you are the only one in your organisation carrying
the burden of implementing business case/solution/process and technical
adjustments. Beware of falling on the knife of your own promises.

Regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

--001a11c288a2bc3e3c04f443ce04--