Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23574 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 23:38:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 23:38:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 78331 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 23:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 78287 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 23:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 78279 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 23:38:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:38:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mz4wheeler@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.50] (HELO mail-ww0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:38:24 +0000 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1153496wwf.7 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NL9QA6/iBFC9byCFbwaPttoavEL6IOEUFMmlFH5yluo=; b=IRHXeT25R2/J08EzJ+hbEtUU7qNcb2zqImisJLTgS9/Ud4PRWqEusMy4kDDuxPDjDa pkP7IypKFPddHJzjcr1b/HVnROyn7OkclXh6qQ1rbGNWJxd3fZnkPPj9ZAnnRA7SoTA9 avoKfSE9UZP6w5Q9+TjUQj4fPj4pw6DxgVMvA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CPhKbWaVjVoFUpVXdkIlqgKbDk9Jdh/YWLgLdoPI5Tl2OAZM4RyhcrrTrK36gamGqA dH95q04awh7ypyBChtZcnvLS6qpWpUdJ+Tnc0NK65uMq3ZgjyyDhy1ddeUW1zLXenK5T 9KbLtwvskPRzQ8ahNlqvC2VBy3FwnxbbG5FSo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.188.67 with SMTP id z45mr2605174wem.7.1295566683045; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.37.146 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D38C5AC.3070407@hlmksw.com> References: <4D38C5AC.3070407@hlmksw.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What happeded to the real flatgrey theme? From: Mike To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But why delete it? Alot of folks learned ofbiz on flatgrey, and their employees are used to it. At least keep it around as flatgrey_old. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > That theme was starting to look old, so the developer community decided t= o > update it. > > If you prefer the old version of the theme, you are welcome to replace th= e > new one with it. > > -Adrian > > On 1/20/2011 3:21 PM, Mike wrote: >> >> I just loaded trunk and discovered that the normal flatgrey theme has >> been completely redefined. =A0What happened? =A0I thought it was actuall= y >> the best theme that was very well organized. =A0Is there a way to get it >> back? >> >