Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96413 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 13:27:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 13:27:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 61923 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 13:27:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 61781 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 13:27:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 61721 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 13:27:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:27:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sakthi.nem@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.172] (HELO mail-gx0-f172.google.com) (209.85.161.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:27:14 +0000 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so1353580gxk.31 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 06:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pBv716xjnPIs881ctGHfM0tGE1nLQo2Pgb62x4PmAO0=; b=uUMW26QaywZWs9j6LjBIBEknOf3Sin3D72UZaTLZYybjcRApPfckHEzl1pA+Pdx6lk hAimeDh63rmLPvhthFty7f+2ZZm/MkC2OwiTJ0zka2UE0GnawwsDEBKZ9P4Oq6CI3/tx ywyMU+uGTXBMD7cjdQY/1tOAMBJHnQTBjBVu0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=BK+7ZbSERFHuzq0Wp1cf1anHmH7clgPrWRfC5FEnvW5jtA0gBbLHVKT2nB2amZY8GZ cnlHm9uoneFRNbQgKU9uP/6eC6e1ccdXZt8up8oVoJf/b1hCh0tWI/nmG6ETONq9Y5p4 F/n5cW0UKz+dBfkAwintCU/QoDk4BM13F6vFU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.225.16 with SMTP id iq16mr2678674qcb.67.1278422763809; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 06:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.126.233 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 06:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 18:56:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Ofbiz vs Openbravo From: sakthi vadivel To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Everyone, Did anyone compare feature by feature above solutions. opentaps, ofbiz vs openbravo I am evaluating these options for a fairly large implementation and would be using PostgreSQL cluster. Thanks with best regards, Mukesh Marathe