Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62488 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 14:28:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 14:28:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 8706 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 14:28:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-user-archive@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 8689 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 14:28:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 8680 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 14:28:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:28:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.24] (HELO qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:28:17 +0000 Received: from omta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.43]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NBeN1e0070vyq2s52ETxdE; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:27:57 +0000 Received: from ruthscomputer.local ([75.150.10.38]) by omta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NETv1e00R0pEla33RETwVr; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:27:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4BFD2FE8.9080603@aesolves.com> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:27:52 -0400 From: Ruth Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Sorely need testers-- was syncing code on server and laptop was demo-trunk error changing Company address References: <19419730.211274822163911.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <31245258.291274826615647.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <9726154.551274828356432.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <11699638.761274829428379.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <12556446.1461274834619296.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <22942428.1881274837280461.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <21564820.2011274838063227.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <10462809.2281274840283131.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <29113063.551274847213440.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <1371161.3591274865546841.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> <3187879.3691274866221142.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> In-Reply-To: <3187879.3691274866221142.JavaMail.root@free-man.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi BJ: If you back-port Selenium to 9.04, I'd be happy to come up with some test cases. I've already got an extensive list of business test case scenarios I used for various tasks involving OFBiz. I can't use 10.x or trunk because I'm still running Java 1.5 in production. Regards, Ruth ---------------------------------------------------- Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoffman@myofbiz.com BJ Freeman wrote: > forgot > should use User manual as the test case. > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation > Specialtymarket.com > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > Linkedin > > > > BJ Freeman sent the following on 5/26/2010 2:18 AM: > >> Chris there are many ways to test. >> I see selenium more as business logic to data test using the available UI. >> It test real world interaction with the user of ofbiz. >> here is one scenario >> Place an order(ecoomerce or Orderentry) >> send product >> view the GL for expected results (through the UI). >> >> For PO >> Place an order(Orderentry) >> receive product >> pay supplier >> check GL for expected results(through the UI) >> Now this test all underlying code and if the user can use the results >> for business. >> >> you can break this down to component tests if you like but the end goal >> is totest user ability to have a functional system. >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >> Specialtymarket.com >> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> Linkedin >> >> >> >> chris snow sent the following on 5/25/2010 9:12 PM: >> >>> Hi BJ - i'd like to start adding selenium tests, however, before adding >>> selenium tests, test cases need to be created. To create test cases, process >>> flows need to be understood/documented (I'm still at the understanding stage >>> hence my work on the help system). So in conclusion only those with >>> detailed knowledge of ofbiz processes can start adding selenium tests (only >>> a few people?). >>> >>> On 26 May 2010 03:18, "BJ Freeman" wrote: >>> >>> we need button pusher and business that need to accomplish a task. >>> one of the top level testing tools is selenium >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3511 >>> your welcome to add to the library. >>> >>> ========================= >>> BJ Freeman >>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < >>> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >>> Specialtymarket.com >>> >>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>> >>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>> Linkedin >>> < >>> http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro >>> >>> >>> Matt Warnock sent the following on 5/25/2010 6:40 PM: >>> >>>> Based on encouraging comments from you and Jacopo and others, and seeing >>>> the rate at which new commits are added, I am thinking it may be best to >>>> get on the trunk, even for production. However I can't imagine running >>>> nightly builds on a production server. >>>> >>>> I'm thinking I'd build nightly on the development laptop, and update the >>>> production server every week or two, to a fairly recent, more-or-less >>>> "known good" revision level. I'm hoping this would provide the best of >>>> both worlds. And I'm hoping that this would avoid any mission-critical >>>> breakages until the fixes have been committed. Does that seem >>>> reasonable? >>>> >>>> I don't kid myself that I can submit much code yet, but hopefully I can >>>> help test and document bugs, even if I can't fix them yet. Hopefully >>>> that will come soon. >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > >