ofbiz-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
Subject Re: Multiple OFBiz instances running on a single machine
Date Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:50:11 GMT
A link can't hurt
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices

Jacques

From: "David E Jones" <david.jones@hotwaxmedia.com>
> 
> I must have missed something... where is the Jira issue for the patch  
> you submitted and who rejected it?
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 9:58 AM, Deyan Tsvetanov wrote:
> 
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I'm sorry for delaying the thread, I was pretty busy the last few
>> days ...
>>
>> It happens :)
>>
>> So back to the discussion:
>> As I mentioned *ALL* the containers can be configured which network
>> interfaces to bind to: ajp ( 8009 ), http ( 8080 ), https ( 8443 ),  
>> iiop
>> ( 2000 ). The only container that does not support this type of
>> configuration is the NamingContainer
>> ( OFBIZ_HOME/framework/base/config/ofbiz-containers.xml ) .
>>
>> Why is it a pain for me ? Because I am running each OFBiz instance  
>> into
>> a different VLAN. Why ? Because I have configured VPN access for each
>> VLAN. And that's not the only reason. I would really like to know that
>> 1099 is RMI, 8009 is AJP.
>>
>> The only thing that breaks my VLAN schema is the NamingContainer,  
>> which
>> binds to *:1099 ( all the available interfaces ).
>>
>> I provided a patch which fixes that injustice and brings everything to
>> order.
>>
>> If you don't like it and think it's useless - it's ok with me - I'll
>> continue using the patched version. And I'll re-apply the patch every
>> time I update the sources from the SVN and get a conflict. For 1 patch
>> it's manageable. For 10 - it's still manageable. For 100 - it's
>> impossible. I'll just have to switch to some other product.
>>
>> But that is actually opposing the open source theory, which says
>> "Everybody can contribute by writing code, sharing experience,  
>> business
>> knowhow, ideas and etc, etc, etc".
>>
>> Now if you give me a reason ( or a list of reasons ) why the feature
>> I've proposed should not be accepted - I'll be glad with it and I'll
>> forget about it forever and ever.
>>
>> I agree that it's a minor priority patch for you guys.
>> But the priority is slightly bigger for me.
>>
>> What I have done so far was:
>>
>> 1) Identify the problem.
>> 2) Propose a solution.
>> 3) Initiate a discussion
>> 4) Hope that the solution is accepted or a better one is proposed.
>>
>> Currently we're on step 3) as my solution was not accepted and a  
>> better
>> one was not proposed.
>>
>> So - I'm eager to move to step 4). The "change the 1099 port"  
>> workaround
>> is definitely not a better solution :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Deyan
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 08:12 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>> The way I chose was to use ajp and change those ports. This makes
>>> updating from the SVN easier.
>>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-HTTPD
>>>
>>>
>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya sent the following on 5/25/2009 5:56 AM:
>>>> Below is my post dated May 21, 2009 on the user mailing list on  
>>>> the User
>>>> Mailing list.
>>>> I guess you have missed my reply.
>>>> Please read the details, give it a try and if got stuckup  
>>>> somewhere then
>>>> come back to discuss the things.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Yes this can be easily done in OFBiz.
>>>>
>>>> Open ofbiz-containers.xml file.
>>>> (framework/base/config/ofbiz-containers.xml)
>>>> Change the value of port in all the property by name "port". For  
>>>> ex. you
>>>> can change http port from 8080 to 28080
>>>>
>>>> Then open url.property file. (framework/webapp/config/ 
>>>> url.properties)
>>>> Keep the value of http & https port same as you set in the
>>>> ofbiz-containers.xml file.
>>>>
>>>> So now we have two instance of OFBiz server on the same machine.
>>>>
>>>> -- One is running on 8080 & another one is running on 28080 port.
>>>>
>>>> For accessing the same database you should keep the settings of  
>>>> database
>>>> same in entityengine.xml file.
>>>> This is all from my side.
>>>>
>>>> Now its your turn to give it a try and if got stuck up somewhere  
>>>> in b/w
>>>> then shoot an email on mailing list.
>>>> Thanks !
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message