Mailing-List: contact user-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vikasmayur@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.146.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=p/bCto2IWe5+GozJ6Jwxd1N+sr6dRIPPKdAZoBZPmMjmNrFLPTz/cR1hjTnetbrQOcx2AItqoXtFIiPYI+qv93C7LMlVfzUwXOo2N5gRtxVkm0x2fAdkjnDsILn01WKUdyNt6R7ByLxZj2XGQBYwQbsSuxX111iOj6vDmSL076M=
Message-ID: <4bfac6a90805020130m48b1209cq4043f420f910d82f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:00:29 +0530
From: "Vikas Mayur" <vikasmayur@gmail.com>
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: security permission
In-Reply-To: <16993344.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_10684_14694483.1209717029394"
References: <16993344.post@talk.nabble.com>

------=_Part_10684_14694483.1209717029394
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

There is a one-nofk relation between SecurityGroupPermission -->
SecurityPermission on permissionId field.
I think, this is the reason its not giving fk error.

If we going to add new security group and than want to add permission(s)
using Ui, It should also add this permission to SecurityPermission, Since
this is the entity which holds the list of Security Permission in system. Is
there any specific reason it is not done in Ui.

Vikas


On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, JohnBrown <michael@softasap.net> wrote:

>
> HI Guys,
>
> I have a question. Is there a particular reason why the permission which
> is
> added manually ( i.e. not selected from the permissions list) on
> Security->
> permission tab is NOT get saved to SecurityPermission entity where all the
> permissions are stored? It appears that manually added permission just
> stored in SecurityGroupPermission to make a mapping to group, but not to
> SecurityPermission. While normally it would require foreign key constraint
> SecurityGroupPermission - > SecurityPermission on permissionId field?
>
> Please, let me know. Thanks.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/security-permission-tp16993344p16993344.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

------=_Part_10684_14694483.1209717029394--