ofbiz-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Gray (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6882) Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements
Date Mon, 26 Mar 2018 02:20:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16413283#comment-16413283
] 

Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-6882:
-----------------------------------

I'm surprised you went with houseNumber [~jacques.le.roux]

What if the address is for an office or a warehouse?  Even with review and doubts from others
on some of these fields you still went ahead without question or even engaging in the discussion.
The houseNumber name is poorly chosen, and Pierre provided no justification for the municipalityGeoId
field.

This wasn't good committer behavior.

> Extend the PostalAddress entity with additional elements
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-6882
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6882
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: party
>    Affects Versions: Trunk
>            Reporter: Pierre Smits
>            Assignee: Pierre Smits
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: 3rdParty, Shipment, integration
>             Fix For: 16.11.01
>
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-6882-party-PostalAddress.patch
>
>
> Various modern day 3rd party delivery solutions (e.g. PostNL in The Netherlands) require
that elements are delivered separately, so that addresses can be checked more easily.
> Current definition of the PostalAddress doesn't have separation of:
> * street name
> * house number
> * house number addition or extension



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message