Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75808200CB4 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:14:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 741DC160BDC; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BBCE7160BD8 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:14:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 63043 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2017 17:14:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 63034 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2017 17:14:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 724081A045E for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yg8BGX5ZUxtB for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id EEC045FD02 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4E546E0DD4 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 198BB2410C for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taher Alkhateeb (JIRA)" To: notifications@ofbiz.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-9435) Refactor Config.java and properties files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:14:07 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16065145#comment-16065145 ] Taher Alkhateeb edited comment on OFBIZ-9435 at 6/27/17 5:13 PM: ----------------------------------------------------------------- The answer for both questions is that I think it's better to keep the comments so that people know what will happen if something is commented out and what will happen if not. If we are going to remove the comments for load-data and test, then we should perhaps remove _all_ comments and keep them in start. Otherwise I think we should have the same file structure for all properties files for consistency's sake. I don't have a strong opinion either way, but I do prefer to have either all or none as far as comments are concerned. was (Author: taher): The answer for both questions is that I think it's better to keep the comments so that people know what will happen if something is commented out and what will happen if not. If we are going to remove the comments for load-data and test, then we should perhaps remove _all_ comments and keep them in start. Otherwise I think we should have the same file structure for all properties files for consistency's sake. > Refactor Config.java and properties files > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-9435 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9435 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Taher Alkhateeb > Assignee: Taher Alkhateeb > Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-9435.patch > > > Apply further refactoring in the start component by reducing some complex logic. Patch will be provided momentarily -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)