ofbiz-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Brohl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7788) Update to 'OFBiz Contributors Best Practices'
Date Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:46:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15500673#comment-15500673
] 

Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-7788:
--------------------------------------

Yes, I see the point: I propose to extend the guideline such as:

"When you find a duplicate of a JIRA issue, please close the newer one with the resolution
'Duplicate', and state what the original issue is.  This does not apply for placeholder
issues or if the newer Jira does contain additional aspects or more comprehensive solutions,
documentation or patches. If in doubt, please discuss on the development mailing list before
choosing one issue over the other."

> Update to 'OFBiz Contributors Best Practices'
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-7788
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7788
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Confluence
>            Reporter: Pierre Smits
>            Assignee: Michael Brohl
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Please add the following to the *When to create a Jira issue* section of the document:
> {quote}
> When you find a duplicate of a JIRA issue, please close the newer one with the resolution
'Duplicate', and state what the original issue is. Closing the older issue is not respectful
to the creator of the first issue, and can be perceived as an insult with respect to his/her
good intentions.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message