Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FE1200D0A for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:40:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 41B551609E2; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 88BE41609D6 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:40:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 2846 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2017 08:40:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 2829 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2017 08:40:35 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 08:40:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7546C18091D for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:40:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0rkG7A6DPZK for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp26.services.sfr.fr (smtp26.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.163]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 70FE060D79 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (183.90.14.81.rev.sfr.net [81.14.90.183]) by msfrf2606.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 29B8D1C006038 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:40:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (183.90.14.81.rev.sfr.net [81.14.90.183]) (Authenticated sender: jacques.leroux60@sfr.fr) by msfrf2606.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPA for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:40:29 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfr.fr; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jacques.leroux60@sfr.fr Subject: Re: [Site] OFBIZ-9665 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org References: <4e69358e-072f-83c5-1f81-b6390516745a@les7arts.com> From: Jacques Le Roux Organization: Les Arts Informatiques Message-ID: <369f1205-6024-9591-1568-728f431675ee@les7arts.com> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:40:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB archived-at: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 08:40:37 -0000 Done at r1811050 Jacques Le 03/10/2017 à 12:07, Aditya Sharma a écrit : > Interesting. Thanks Deepak for sharing that. > > +1 for having target="external" at all places as consistency is key to good > user experience. > > Thanks and Regards, > > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer > HotWax Systems > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Devanshu Vyas > wrote: > >> Thanks Deepak, I looked for similar info, but was unable to find. And in >> the meantime, got to know about the Rel attribute, so I thought the >> intended code was rel rather than target='external'. >> Now, with the new information at hand, I think target="_blank" or >> target="external" both are correct. All we need to decide is whether to >> open all links in separate tabs everytime link is clicked or just once. >> >> I think we should open all external links with target="external". WDYAS? >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Devanshu Vyas. >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote: >> >>> Ha thanks Deepak, >>> >>> This is interesting (and surprising), so we should change ALL >>> target="_blank" to target="external" rather for consistency sake >>> >>> If everybody agree I will do so >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 03/10/2017 à 10:18, Deepak Dixit a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi Devanshu, >>>> >>>> I think target="external" is correct. >>>> >>>> https://www.quackit.com/html/codes/html_open_link_in_new_window.cfm >>>> >>>> {info} >>>> Instead of calling your window _blank, you can give it a name of your >>>> choosing. Then all URLs will load in that same tab (as long as you use >> the >>>> same name). >>>> >>>> For example, if you have a policy of loading all external links in a >>>> separate tab, you could call that tab, say, external. Then each link >> that >>>> contains target="external" will open in that window/tab. Doing this >>>> ensures >>>> that new windows aren't going to be popping up every time a user clicks >> on >>>> a link. >>>> >>>> {info} >>>> >>>> Thanks & Regards >>>> -- >>>> Deepak Dixit >>>> www.hotwaxsystems.com >>>> www.hotwax.co >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Devanshu Vyas < >> vyas.devanshu16@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>>> I agree with Jacques and Aditya, we should set all external links with >>>>> target="_blank". I have also mentioned the same on the JIRA ticket >>>>> . >>>>> I think the intended use is rel="external", which was somehow written >> as >>>>> target="external", refer: https://www.w3schools.com/Tags/att_a_rel.asp >>>>> >>>>> Hope this helps! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks & Regards, >>>>> Devanshu Vyas. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < >>>>> slidingfilaments@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> AFAIK "_blank" is the only acceptable target in HTML 5 because frames >>>>>> are deprecated. The website is modern and built on an HTML 5 template. >>>>>> Hence every target should be "_blank" >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Aditya and I want to change all "external" targets to "_blank" but >> are >>>>>>> unsure of the reason of "external" targets >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could someone please confirm it's not an issue and maybe explain why >> we >>>>>> have >>>>>> >>>>>>> "external" targets >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>>