Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F61200BD0 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:38:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 266EF160B13; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D620160B06 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:38:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 81565 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2016 19:38:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 81549 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2016 19:38:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:38:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CB65E1800EC for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:38:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.88 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YzTgVOKBPQlS for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com (mail-lf0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 533765F4A8 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t196so155054873lff.3 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:38:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BizBxDMN1A6SJ4HhPsJLQ9lj9Xgt+UFqR+SkkiXygPg=; b=wPqdEFHgLgjyIWb6Q//X7SKnYsfe3Pqgf+M/9hqLGlE5tIXqLTpTMKFLUloXciDsWs CJ4pvZIig269FaNlAEt/6D1rfeVuioHHMONAM+JBT6P4GaiyjvMc6SGYZWPSm88jsYzK BMO6mypGtvncbuYtgVYpOUhl9m4+yXhPZ0y2sq9JNz6PM8KD197a3NVKodLPh0R/85AK 6tTejKoVDpeEHJKHz1Po4PKXZYUKJ1LUjSm953G47bwo7uivkY142zgYGlztc44MixEb FmN16GWBBvFW6S/4tN4y1zYAK+0yjCnHGxuJHic49Mnm0ei7PO7/t7Fe5Km/SMFJy323 HBLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=BizBxDMN1A6SJ4HhPsJLQ9lj9Xgt+UFqR+SkkiXygPg=; b=T7wJjP62OtsyNAsCV7cA867tCge7VzyQo1wuiiVQYCKSo7r4fJiK4eHmsS3HfBfw1B 9reyQwFq2NjkquYLMWeIEgXpALMJP+Glt4JZRcKfYQiiW2KUpjBSSu2eFhWwGVmaC9Df xvReMEXQsCcymnFveoQ3JCCBBvRKQIhMGY01Uo10UmpjJQxZi0xKZk0FH+9lzUotcsd0 L9zZPMCwge1QJpK7aNgCum+AXM7WLzmvw5M+TnJFCdRVMHESM9OVE5eYEtNAqSBcyXnS mw/GE5x47SwxQU4PSDlqTt3ewtyEvZOSAn+vdkH7skyyLvSxhlnfsN/8lfBhrYdN+4gA aVEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03q2RXxRDePhY7qbEZFCT+64lBPSJ7622YgcL/I/r3NJRMYAsw9GuCxt4yz8jXkLnsXOgoWNkmuo3SgGw== X-Received: by 10.46.32.136 with SMTP id g8mr353769lji.63.1480534730074; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:38:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.182.172 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:38:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5a0937c1-f7dc-cc7a-b823-33dcbb3a06cd@les7arts.com> <4a67e2eb-292b-fd5b-679b-f5321dfedc71@nereide.fr> From: Pierre Smits Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:38:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Improving the OFBiz User Interface To: "dev@ofbiz.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142bfa2a9ef63054289da6b archived-at: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:38:56 -0000 --001a1142bfa2a9ef63054289da6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You talking about something like - [1], which is bootstrap based and intended for customer facing apps (e.g. cmssite and ecommerce variants), - [2], which is current default ecommerce theme elements disentangled from the framework stack ? [1] https://github.com/ORRTIZ/ecbootstrap [2] https://github.com/ORRTIZ/ecdefault Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Gaurav Saini wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Looks like I am jumping a bit late here. But as Julien said I am really > interested on working on the UI side of the project. I am still looking > deep into the ofbiz structure and understand how Julien is proposing to d= o > UI customisation so I can help and make OFBiz look good :) > > For starting what I am able to understand and quickly start is prepare a > theme for the e-commerce component that is responsive in nature and with > good UI/UX components. So, anyone starting with ofbiz can directly use th= e > theme with minor changes according to need. > > Just to mention, I have updated my angular code to github which i present= ed > in presentation at ApacheCON. I have already posting link on hipchat, if > somebody interested can look into it. I was interested in using angular a= s > all together different single page app outside ofbiz because it helped me > do good amount of UI customisation and on the other hand for small module= s > or some specific requirement it was really light-weight to use at client'= s > end. > https://github.com/gauravsaini03/ofbiz-angular > > Thanks > Gaurav > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Julien NICOLAS > > wrote: > > > Yes, I agree, let's make it simple for the POC. > > > > > > > > On 30/11/2016 11:07, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > >> Amazing discussion and initiative. > >> =E2=80=8BMy only recommendation at the moment is to try to plan very s= hort (in > >> scope and in time) development cycles (requirements gathering and > >> discussion, design, implementation, review) so that each cycle could > focus > >> on a specific experiment/proposal (e.g. a given ui technology) and cou= ld > >> deliver a proof of concept to the community (e.g. as a new component) > for > >> further discussion and work. > >> > >> In this way we will be able to quickly implement and compare different > >> solutions/technologies and will have a chance to take a more informed > >> decision. > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Regards, > *Gaurav Saini* > --001a1142bfa2a9ef63054289da6b--