ofbiz-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pierre Smits (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-6647) Refactoring to consolidate different Calendar implementations
Date Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:59:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902539#comment-14902539
] 

Pierre Smits edited comment on OFBIZ-6647 at 9/22/15 12:58 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

I don't mind having both. Adrian explained why it is this way. 


was (Author: pfm.smits):
I don't having both. Adrian explained why it is this way. 

> Refactoring to consolidate different Calendar implementations
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-6647
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6647
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch
>            Reporter: Michael Brohl
>            Assignee: Michael Brohl
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> This came up in reference to [6594|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6594]:
> Piere Smits: "Currently we are using 'import com.ibm.icu.util.Calendar' at various places.
But we're also using 'java.util.Calendar' at other places.
> Better is it to make a choice for consistency."
> We should fisrt analyze the usage of different implementations and the impact of replacing
one with the other (e.g. what's the difference of these implementations).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message