ofbiz-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
Subject Re: VOTE RESULT: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui
Date Sat, 02 May 2015 14:26:59 GMT
Thanks Jacques!

One of the biggest challenges ahead will be trying to build consensus - 
since we can't even agree on how a vote should be worded.

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 5/1/2015 7:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> At least Adrian brought this on the table and it was worth beginning to
> discuss :)
>
> We know now that nobody would do it w/o a PoC
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 01/05/2015 08:10, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>> On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:12 PM, David E. Jones <dejc@me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This doesn’t seem to represent the responses very well. My vote
>>> shouldn’t be considered a +1 unless my interpretation of the proposal
>>> (as a PoC in a branch) was correct, and I saw no comment on that… in
>>> fact from this message it seems that is explicitly NOT what the vote
>>> was supposed to be about based on the comment that doing a PoC in a
>>> branch requires no vote.
>>>
>> I had the same thought: for example, I didn't understand why David's
>> and my vote have been classified as +1 and -1 respectively when I have
>> clearly mentioned: "+1 to this proposal by David".
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>> Overall the vote proposal and discussion thread was very confusing, I
>>> don’t see how you could get any sort of vote count out of it… most
>>> people replied with multiple votes with different clarifications!
>>>
>>> This VOTE RESULT never should have been done, the vote should simply
>>> have been cancelled or reframed.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 30 Apr 2015, at 00:55, Adrian Crum
>>>> <adrian.crum@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here is the tally of the votes. This was a challenge because many
>>>> replies included votes for other things, so this tally represents my
>>>> best effort at counting votes for the original subject.
>>>>
>>>> PMC Members (Binding)
>>>> ---------------------
>>>> +0 | 2  (Adam Heath, Jacques Le Roux)
>>>> +1 | 1  (David Jones)
>>>> -1 | 3  (Nicolas Malin, Scott Gray, Jacopo Cappellato)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Others (non-Binding)
>>>> --------------------
>>>> +0 | 1  (Adrian Crum)
>>>> -1 | 2  (Ron Wheeler, Martin Becker)
>>>>
>>>> The vote failed to pass with 3 -1 votes and 1 +1 vote.
>>>>
>>>> The replies included a discussion about creating a POC branch to
>>>> explore the subject further. That can be done without a vote, so I
>>>> will consider this vote closed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Adrian Crum
>>>> Sandglass Software
>>>> www.sandglass-software.com
>>>>
>>>> On 4/26/2015 3:44 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>> As was discussed last week, there is some interest in replacing
>>>>> some (or
>>>>> all) of OFBiz with Moqui (http://www.moqui.org/framework/index.html).
>>>>>
>>>>> To the scope reasonable, I propose that we begin by converting the
>>>>> following parts of the OFBiz framework with Moqui:
>>>>>
>>>>> Entity Engine
>>>>> Service Engine
>>>>> Security
>>>>>
>>>>> Other parts of the OFBiz framework could be converted as well, but I
>>>>> think this would be a good starting point, and if is successful, then
>>>>> more of OFBiz can be converted later.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe we can create a thunk component to help solve compatibility
>>>>> problems, but that is a separate discussion. I only mention it here in
>>>>> case compatibility concerns might influence a vote.
>>>>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message