ofbiz-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Heath <doo...@brainfood.com>
Subject Re: Fwd: Re: Maven
Date Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:11:59 GMT
As for deploying of artifacts, I've already done a "mvn install" 
locally, which copies the built files into $HOME/.m2/; so I know that 
eventually when everything is done, we could deploy into the global 
shared repo.


On 04/22/2015 09:03 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
>
> Just to let everyone know that we are not the only people working on a 
> switch to Maven.
> The Apache FOP team is also trying to see what the impact would be of 
> switching to Maven.
>
> Being able to put libraries in Maven Central more easily seems to be a 
> hot topic.
> Building the appropriate artifacts seems to be hard using their 
> existing build tools.
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message from FOP mailing List--------
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmbernardo@gmail.com 
> <mailto:lmpmbernardo@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>    Maybe I only spoke for myself, but I am in: +1
>
>     From what I understand publishing the source jars to maven central
>    would be automatic then, since there is some plugin for that. Given
>    the fact that I have spent many hours adapting the Batik ant file to
>    produce the source jars for maven central (I am still in the process
>    of checking the result is correct) any steps that help with that in
>    the future (be either for FOP or Batik) are welcome.
>
>
> that's my exact thinking; one reason we have historically done a poor 
> job of maven deployment is because we aren't using maven; switching to 
> maven will make that a no-brainer and ensure correct deployment
>
>
>
>    On 4/22/15 6:35 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Luis Bernardo
>>     <lmpmbernardo@gmail.com <mailto:lmpmbernardo@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         I think that maven will be embraced as soon as there is a
>>         volunteer to do the transition.
>>
>>
>>     A few years ago I went through the process of creating a full
>>     maven configuration for FOP; however, the group was not ready to
>>     make the transition at that time.
>>
>>     I have recently converted another multiple-module internal project
>>     to maven from ant, and would be able to repeat the process on fop.
>>     However, I don't want to do it unless there is support to switch 
>> over.
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 4/22/15 6:13 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>>         on another point, when can we transition to maven? our ant
>>>         configurations are difficult to maintain and understand; we
>>>         should modernize
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message