ofbiz-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] reintroduce the evicted specialpurpose components in R13.07
Date Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:52:12 GMT
Hi Jacques,

I already provided an answer earlier in this thread while you were typing
the question.

Taher Alkhateeb

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:

> Le 25/03/2015 11:34, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Can we say that the Birt reports are better? Do they always work (I got
>>> some issues there)
>>>
>> No, I wouldn't say that (of course you are free to think otherwise, it is
>> just the *we* part that I disagree with).
>>
>
> OK to sum up, why do we have Birt there then? (question not specifically
> intended to you Jacopo)
>
>  Also just tried http://demo-stable-ofbiz.apache.org/accounting/control/
>>> FinancialSummaryReportOptions?organizationPartyId=Company where Birt is
>>> not and all reports fail, normal?
>>>
>> I am not sure I understand... I got the same errors with or without Birt:
>> the request maps are not defined; I don't see how this bug fits into this
>> conversation.
>>
>
> Same with trunk demo, OK to be revisited :/
>
>  But for example, the balance sheet report:
>> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/BalanceSheet?
>> organizationPartyId=Company
>> is not a Birt report and works well; however the if you click on the
>> "Export as pdf" button you get an error when Birt is active while it works
>> when Birt is inactive.
>>
>
> So again, why do we have Birt there then? (question not specifically
> intended to you Jacopo)
>
> Jacques
>
>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>  Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 24/03/2015 16:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>
>>>> The accounting component has financial reports implemented as screen
>>>> widgets (html/pdf/csv) that the Birt component overrides with different
>>>> ones implemented with Birt.
>>>> This is actually one example about a specialpurpose component that is
>>>> overriding/hiding functionality that is already provided by the
>>>> applications with a different one: you can't see them when Birt is enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Don't we also have dependencies on birt? Regarding reporting in
>>>>> accounting
>>>>> and order?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Pierre Smits
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message