Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11792 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2010 08:38:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2010 08:38:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 67765 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2010 08:38:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ofbiz-dev-archive@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 67720 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2010 08:38:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ofbiz.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ofbiz.apache.org Received: (qmail 67710 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2010 08:38:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:38:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.85.153.8] (HELO mx1.lost-oasis.net) (212.85.153.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:38:37 +0000 Received: from sp137-2-82-246-110-179.fbx.proxad.net ([82.246.110.179] helo=[192.168.0.25]) by mx1.lost-oasis.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NQzUv-0001aB-WC for dev@ofbiz.apache.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:38:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4B3F05ED.6000008@nereide.biz> Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:38:05 +0100 From: Erwan de FERRIERES Reply-To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=E9r=E9ide?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Lightning/1.0b1pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk References: <20100101003954.6B37828037@ceres.apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, Le 01/01/2010 22:01, Scott Gray a �crit : > On 1/01/2010, at 1:12 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >> >> Is there any way to get more details about this? Yes, with looking at the JUnit HTML results, in runtime/logs/test-results/html/ A CI server is displaying the results there : http://selenium.neogia.org/junit/results/tests_2009.12.31_23:29:21/index.html From taking a quick look at the tests having the errors, we are using 2009 data, instead of 2010... I'm going to correct them. Cheers, > ../.. -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz