ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Next Release
Date Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:55:58 GMT
Yeah, I just arrived at the same conclusion.  I vote for 1.1.1 as well.


On 12/5/07, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org> wrote:
>
> Actually I was reviewing the list of changes and there's nothing really
> major. A long list of small fixes, performance and usability improvements
> but nothing earth-shattering. It still provides a lot of value for users
> are
> there are a few annoying things in there but given that we're holding up
> the
> major features for a little more, what about calling it a 1.1.1 instead of
> 1.2? I think it captures the minor nature of the release a bit better and
> leaves 1.2 for the bells and whistles.
>
> Matthieu
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 8:14 AM, Tammo van Lessen <tvanlessen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Matthieu Riou wrote:
> > > On Dec 5, 2007 7:09 AM, Tammo van Lessen <tvanlessen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I see, ok. Then I got it wrong in your last mail. Sorry. E4X assigns
> > and
> > >> extension activities are not (yet) back ported to the 1.1 branch. It
> > >> would be okay for me to put into the next release train but I think
> > it's
> > >> not that hard to port it back to 1.2. What do you guys think?
> > >> (especially regarding the change in the OAssign and some other
> OClasses
> > >> - users would need to compile their processes again)
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yeah, I'd love to get these features out ASAP but they also break
> > backward
> > > compatibility of the compiled process and for a lot of people with
> > running
> > > instances that's a problem. I think we should have a fairly
> > > conservative 1.2and then introduce all these changes in
> > > 2.0 once we'll have a way to support compiled processes migration.
> > Hopefully
> > > that should come quickly, I thinks this release has already been far
> too
> > > long to come. I don't feel like delaying much more 1.2 as we have a
> lot
> > of
> > > fixes in the 1.1 branch that are pretty useful. Sounds good?
> > Yep, sounds good.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >  Tammo
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message