Mailing-List: contact user-help@nutch.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@nutch.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: Markus Jelsma <markus.jelsma@openindex.io>
Reply-To: markus.jelsma@openindex.io
Organization: Openindex
To: user@nutch.apache.org
Subject: Re: The correct tutorial on the home page?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:41:09 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-29-generic; KDE/4.5.5; i686; ; )
Cc: Eric Pugh <epugh@opensourceconnections.com>
References: <37410ECB-80CC-4685-884E-7BB0AB49F5F1@opensourceconnections.com>
In-Reply-To: <37410ECB-80CC-4685-884E-7BB0AB49F5F1@opensourceconnections.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201107142241.10005.markus.jelsma@openindex.io>

Hi Erik,

Lewis already moved a lot of < 1.3 stuff to a legacy area on the wiki. The 
tutorial on the pointed to from the homepage is indeed old but also contains 
recent additions. Perhaps we should merge those two tutorials and get rid of 
RunningNutchAndSolr. The NutchTutorial seems more appropriate in >= 1.3.

Cheers

> Hi all, I am getting back up to speed on Nutch after being away for a
> couple versions!  I noticed the tutorial linked from the homepage is to
> this one: http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/NutchTutorial
> 
> However, it seems like with Nutch moving to using Solr, that the tutorial
> that should be linked to is
> http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/RunningNutchAndSolr#A3._Crawl_your_first_webs
> ite
> 
> Alternatively, the content for all the pre 1.3 Nutch should be moved to a
> different NutchTutorial wiki page, and the NutchTutorial updated with the
> Solr content?
> 
> 
> 
> Eric
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com Co-Author: Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search
> Server available from
> http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server This e-mail and
> all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company
> Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether
> attachments are marked as such.