nifi-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GitBox <>
Subject [GitHub] [nifi] pgyori opened a new pull request #4287: NIFI-7445: Add Conflict Resolution property to PutAzureDataLakeStorage processor
Date Wed, 20 May 2020 16:15:05 GMT

pgyori opened a new pull request #4287:
   #### Description of PR
   PutAzureDataLakeStorage processor now has a conflict resolution property. With the help
of this property the user can specify how the processor should behave in case there is a name
conflict when uploading a file Azure.
   ### For all changes:
   - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
        in the commit message?
   - [ ] Does your PR title start with **NIFI-XXXX** where XXXX is the JIRA number you are
trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
   - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically
   - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? _Additional commits in response
to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking.
Do not `squash` or use `--force` when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes._
   ### For code changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via `mvn -Pcontrib-check
clean install` at the root `nifi` folder?
   - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
   - [ ] Have you verified that the full build is successful on both JDK 8 and JDK 11?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way
that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](

   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE` file, including the main `LICENSE`
file under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `NOTICE` file, including the main `NOTICE` file
found under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added `.displayName` in addition to .name (programmatic
access) for each of the new properties?
   ### For documentation related changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
   ### Note:
   Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI for build issues
and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:

View raw message