From issues-return-63795-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@nifi.apache.org Sat Sep 1 04:15:53 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 402F8180675 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 04:15:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3779 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2018 02:15:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 3759 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2018 02:15:52 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 02:15:52 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 73C91E04A3; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 02:15:51 +0000 (UTC) From: MikeThomsen To: issues@nifi.apache.org Reply-To: issues@nifi.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] nifi pull request #2820: NIFI-5327 Adding Netflowv5 protocol parser Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20180901021551.73C91E04A3@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 02:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2820#discussion_r214501416 --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-network-bundle/nifi-network-processors/src/main/resources/docs/org.apache.nifi.processors.network.ParseNetflowv5/additionalDetails.html --- @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + + + +Netflowv5Parser + + + + +

+ Netflowv5Parser processor parses the ingress netflowv5 datagram format + and transfers it either as flowfile attributes or JSON object. + Netflowv5 format has predefined schema named "template" for parsing + the netflowv5 record. More information: RFC-netflowv5 +

--- End diff -- My $0.02 is that we keep this as-is and have a separate, record-based version of this. So I'm fine with this. ---