Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE33420049C for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BCA5D16CEFE; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F8A816CEFB for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 38889 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2017 07:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 38874 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2017 07:53:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C8554C04B8 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-VNb-qx77TB for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5CF525FE2E for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 87492E002B for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6689524199 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: issues@nifi.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4257) Allow a custom WHERE clause in AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:53:05 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16122989#comment-16122989 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4257: -------------------------------------- Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2050#discussion_r132631612 --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/GenerateTableFetch.java --- @@ -259,6 +261,11 @@ public void onTrigger(final ProcessContext context, final ProcessSessionFactory } }); + if(customWhereClause != null) { + // adding the custom WHERE clause (if defined) to the list of existing clauses. + maxValueClauses.add(customWhereClause); --- End diff -- Yes @patricker, that makes sense, will push a commit for that. Thanks! > Allow a custom WHERE clause in AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: NIFI-4257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4257 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Extensions > Reporter: Pierre Villard > Assignee: Pierre Villard > > It could be useful allowing a user to set a custom WHERE clause in AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor in case not all of the data in the table is required. > In case the WHERE clause is changed after the processor has already been running, the user will probably have to set the initial maximum values to ensure the expected behaviour. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)