From dev-return-19716-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@nifi.apache.org Sat Aug 31 01:05:27 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id EA1DA18065E for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 03:05:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 4102 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2019 01:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 4090 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2019 01:05:25 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 01:05:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C2150C0B44 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 01:05:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.8 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-ec2-va.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IEF_QFa6Cyq for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 01:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.167.171; helo=mail-oi1-f171.google.com; envelope-from=bbende@gmail.com; receiver= Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (mail-oi1-f171.google.com [209.85.167.171]) by mx1-ec2-va.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-ec2-va.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 73E0CBC7E2 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 01:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id t24so6702874oij.13 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:05:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tC5kRhsO/4PazEEfPMe5RMu8u1CeJlowI5V6/SknsxE=; b=De7BWyh52qGB6A+X7DkFZVyXv2T/i9khsy2cUrBu7kwXEErYjPxc65QU/+ckBJHvQ2 f9fNm6t3ufka5I+6xvClw94Fj0qeL/ZW7khS26YgVJwmQcP4cm4JWq0JBjV3hDLIvSnH SgX9eOkRKygGmh26TtVYjHk7PChUS7TzJPQZTNRPuJpoaCxPGZYttAT5esfXuzKy3qzO eAoaRnPsYEAVhB6X1g8eEr04y0fAvEBF3HWkq7ZmICZ9wjIyxPDuPmevgN1C30NsYZt+ MAdDDAsi4O18yVkm07RayuiOA/8/xkDH/CqHFljzvlVU95/ftOLRpBZYa5Aqczohp0gb izVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tC5kRhsO/4PazEEfPMe5RMu8u1CeJlowI5V6/SknsxE=; b=sDhi7UtUNRcpIYwHla6rqBBCetztCJdrgAxJkMvs6cYogIQ1s9+1p349sFC0m4BWHh UVW/Y+O4O8q85CyREWz3XIKCRr3h2WB4PDQL/6boyUnBQTAdje0RchwWjOFHD6+bTcgq 7iksKNCbYPm+3ExiHJLwsA9I5jDsxi+Md98IG3HeFHDBvbMv2RjTihSAYwxo70c8dk9s 68B0sJsqsZ7Pna768alqCPQawoAD9kRescoQCzBRTYHec3o6CFX27VjPKxlsEyTGO1fC LPJbDT8hTnEpPWJiXh2o2zMrtMpo4/DL3hwtUgMw01aYbVQVjDCzWusU0maqkHG8Z7yN k/pA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUs3RMkD5++UK+S3Up3Z/p5gHPzTCqwZr9cw03KME5HrL6KP9r5 OtR3IqWzI6n4RaU+jb5bLlneB99s/3c89Z1qOMLqaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3S+yvdsK10XBhaUWh7m/0JvsfwuCNqirf99SRY1Hmc+LlQWmrpyU4I7dZ1Tk/jIHcKv79733YXk32MbOth98= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:903:: with SMTP id w3mr11233517oih.119.1567213511316; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:05:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1135355793.453412.1567195378252.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1135355793.453412.1567195378252@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1135355793.453412.1567195378252@mail.yahoo.com> From: Bryan Bende Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:05:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: File-based Versioned Flow Representation To: dev@nifi.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1170705915f5438" --000000000000a1170705915f5438 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I=E2=80=99d like to see us move towards the versioned flow representation f= rom registry and add features to NiFi like right click on PG and export to versioned flow, import from a file etc. The Minifi java toolkit already has a transform from versioned flow JSON to YAML, just like the template transform. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:05 PM Samuel Hjelmfelt wrote: > Hello everyone,NIFI-6539 brings up the topic of deployment scenarios when > a NiFi registry is not available. MiNiFi allows configuration via a YML > file-based representation of a flow, often created from an exported NiFi > template. However, there has been a push to focus on versioned flows in t= he > registry and to move away from templates. > Long term, what is the plan for file-based flow representations? Is the > intent to continue using templates even in NiFi 2.x, or is there some oth= er > solution planned? Both deployments without a registry and registry > import/export will require some kind of file-based flow representation. > -Sam > --=20 Sent from Gmail Mobile --000000000000a1170705915f5438--