nifi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter Wicks (pwicks)" <>
Subject RE: [EXT] Re: NiFi 2.0 Roadmap
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:58:47 GMT
I've also heard something about a big change to the way relationships work. Maybe grouping
relationships into larger groupings "failure" as a parent, with multiple optional/fine grained,
children. Something like that.  If that rings a bell, maybe add it to your list 😊.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Witt <> 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 11:31 AM
Subject: [EXT] Re: NiFi 2.0 Roadmap

It makes sense there would be an mvp set of registry capability and thus a dependency for
nifi 2.0 on registry readiness/version.  Otherwise I would largely hope not.

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 1:29 PM Otto Fowler <> wrote:

> Will that effort or planning be across all the nifi projects?  minifi 
> / cpp / registry etc?
> On June 14, 2019 at 13:01:36, Joe Witt ( wrote:
> Peter,
> Yeah I think we're all circling around similar thoughts on things 
> which are 'best for a major release' and we need to start codifying 
> that. At the same time we need this to be focused on items which can 
> only reasonably happen in a major release and not become a new kitchen 
> sink for JIRAs/ideas. We should frame up a wiki page for this effort. 
> I'm happy to kick that off soon (time permitting). In my mind the key 
> domino here is having a Flow Registry that can hold extensions and we 
> can then make nifi
> 2.0 fundamentally about distributing nifi as a kernel (small as 
> possible) and all extensions come from a flow registry on demand. 
> Other obvious things like Java 11 as the base requirement and killing 
> off deprecated things come to mind.
> Thanks
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:45 AM Peter Wicks (pwicks) 
> <>
> wrote:
> > I've seen a lot of comments along the line of, "I don't think this 
> > will happen before NiFi 2.0". Do we have a roadmap/list somewhere of 
> > the big general changes planned for NiFi 2.0 or some kind of 2.0 roadmap?
> >
> > --Peter
> >
View raw message